Hi Ferenc,

+1. It makes sense to move the Kudu connector under the Flink umbrella, I
agree that it should support Flink 1.19 and 1.20 (maybe 2.0 soon) and
thanks for volunteering as the release manager.

Cheers,
Marton

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 1:00 PM Ferenc Csaky <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid>
wrote:

> Hello devs,
>
> I would like to start a discussion to release the externalized Kudu
> connector. To make anyone
> up to date regarding what happened until now and why, let me summarize the
> story.
>
> Originally, the Kudu connector was part of the Bahir Flink [1] repository,
> but it was moved into
> the attic in early 2024. Since there was demand to still maintain and
> develop this connector, I
> initiated FLIP-439 [2] to externalize this connector and adapt it to the
> externalized Flink
> connector model.
>
> I think at this point the connector is in a good state, all the original
> deliverables are done, and
> some new features and improvements were also developed that was not part
> of the scope of
> the FLIP, feel free to check all the items [3]. All in all, I think the
> connector is ready for its first
> release in the standalone externalized model, and according to the current
> Flink releases I
> would suggest to release it for the currently supported 1.x minor Flink
> versions, which means
> 1.19, and 1.20.
>
> If the community agrees, I also volunteer to be the release manager.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks,
> Ferenc
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bahir-flink
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-439%3A+Externalize+Kudu+Connector+from+Bahir
> [3]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37527?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20kudu-2.0.0%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20

Reply via email to