Hi Gyula, Thanks for responding, that sounds reasonable, Kind regards, David.
From: Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 24 February 2025 at 10:31 To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Flink Operator 1.11 release planning Hi David! Thanks for the feedback. This change has been already merged and was relatively minor in the bigger scheme of things. There is nothing conceptually binding the operator to Flink 1.x versions, and it is naturally designed to be cross compatible. Flink Operator 2.0 is not planned at the moment and even in the future it won't have much to do with Flink versions but instead changes/refinmenents in the CRD itself. I will proceed with the RC1 tomorrow after merging some outstanding critical fixes. Cheers, Gyula On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:11 AM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am not sure how the v2 preview would fit with 1.11. I would think we > would probably want to separate Flink v1 from a v2 operator. It seems > strange to have support for v2 even as a preview in a 3rd digit change like > 1.11. Definitely +1 for a separate early v2 Flink operator and a separate > Flink v1 bug release as 1.11, > > Kind regards, David. > > From: yuanfeng hu <yuanf...@apache.org> > Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2025 at 03:17 > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Flink Operator 1.11 release planning > +1 > > Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 于2025年2月5日周三 11:15写道： > > > Thanks Gyula for starting this discussion, +1 for the release and > timeline. > > > > Best > > Rui > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 8:29 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 4:11 AM Sharath <dsaishar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1, Looking forward to the release! > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 6:50 PM Peter Huang < > huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 from me. I can help with some release verification. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 6:40 PM ConradJam <jam.gz...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom Cooper <c...@tomcooper.dev> 于2025年1月31日周五 18:20写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 from me. Getting a release out with the 2.0 preview for > > testing > > > > > before > > > > > > > the full 2.0 release seems like a good idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom Cooper > > > > > > > @tomncooper | tomcooper.dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, 31 January 2025 at 09:27, Gyula Fóra < > > > gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to kick off the release planning for the 1.11 > > > operator > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the codebase is in excellent shape with a lot of nice > > > > > features > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > improvements since the latest release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My suggestion would be to wrap up current PRs and target mid > > > february > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > the release cut. > > > > > > > > We should also be able to include Flink 2.0 preview support > > this > > > way > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > > > ConradJam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best, > Yuanfeng > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN > Unless otherwise stated above: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
