Sry for the late reply, also +1 to have this in 2.0 given that we don't guarantee backwards compatibility, and it is already not compatible in many ways. Looking forward to this.
Best, Zakelly On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 9:20 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you both for the efforts. The progress sounds great. > > JFYI, there are still a few other blocker issues, and based on the progress > of resolving them my estimation would be creating RC1 around next Friday. > So for this feature there's no need to rush. Take your time for code > reviewing and testing. > > As for the migration tool, I agree it's a bigger scope issue, and should > not block the release. Actually, what I have in mind is something > independent from any Flink version, and may serve for general incompatible > state migration. > > Best, > > Xintong > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:16 AM Kurt Ostfeld <kurtostf...@proton.me.invalid > > > wrote: > > > A state migration tool that can migrate savepoints/checkpoints is a great > > idea that would be very useful for a lot of scenarios. But that is a > bigger > > scope issue. > > > > (fyi, CI is passing and PR should be fully ready) > > >
