+1 (binding) The simplified approach makes complete sense!
Gyula Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Dec 2024, at 16:33, David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) from me > Gyula: Yes I agree, let’s leave this open till then. > > I just wanted to check you are ok with running being the condition we use for > both application and session cluster; this is even simpler than your post on > the 23rd of September. Running = business as usual = started and running as > you would expect. So avoiding the ready vs running debate, > Kind regards, David > > From: gyula.f...@gmail.com <gyula.f...@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, 20 December 2024 at 15:08 > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > Cc: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] FLIP-493: Add K8S conditions to CRD's Status > > Hey! > > I suggest to keep this vote open until the 6th of January given that half the > world will be on holidays for sure :) > > Gyula > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 20 Dec 2024, at 14:52, Lajith Koova <lajith...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-493: Add K8S conditions to CRD's Status > > [1] which has been discussed in this thread [2]. > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or > > not enough votes. > > > > > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-493%3A+Add+K8S+conditions+to+CRD%27s+Status > > > > [2] > > https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@flink.apache.org:2024-12:FLIP-XXX%20Add%20K8S%20conditions%20to%20Flink%20CRD > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Lajith > Unless otherwise stated above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
