Hi Ferenc,

Thanks for pointing this out! After confirmation with others, I think you
are right.

It's fair enough to revert the PR that remove per-job mode in
2.0-preview. But we need to make sure we don't include per-job stuff in
2.0.0.

Best regards,

Weijie


Ferenc Csaky <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid> 于2024年10月9日周三 21:55写道:

> Hello devs,
>
> I just noticed there is an already merged change [1] that removes per-job
> mode from the
> codebase. Regarding that, I would like to mention FLINK-26000 [2] that
> exists for the same
> for quite a while, and the reason why we kept the code until now is that,
> Application Mode
> does not support SQL job submission. AFAIK that is still the case.
> FLIP-316 [3] aimed to fill
> this gap utilizing the SQL Gateway, although it is stale for quite a while.
>
> So if I am not missing something, as it is right now Flink 2.0 will lose
> the ability of deploying
> SQL jobs to their dedicated cluster on YARN. Is this something the
> community considered?
> I understand that there is more focus around K8s nowadays, but we for
> example have a
> platform that operates on YARN, and most of our customers use that, where
> per-job mode is
> critical for resource isolation.
>
> Looking forward for your thoughts!
>
> Best,
> Ferenc
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36310
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26000
> [3]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-316%3A+Support+application+mode+for+SQL+Gateway

Reply via email to