I personally don't see any open questions so we can proceed. G
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 1:43 PM Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to help move this forward. Based on our previous discussion, I > will proceed with a vote in the coming days if there are no objections. > > > Best, > Zakelly > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:01 PM Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Chesnay, > > > > I was wondering if there have been any updates or plans following our > > discussion? > > I could offer some help if needed. > > > > > > Best, > > Zakelly > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 3:22 PM liu ron <ron9....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1, > >> > >> Best, > >> Ron > >> > >> Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2023年7月26日周三 14:19写道： > >> > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > > >> > Best > >> > Yun Tang > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 14:10 > >> > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend > classes > >> to > >> > o.a.f.state.rocksdb package > >> > > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Best Regards, > >> > Yu > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:47, Yanfei Lei <fredia...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 for moving all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under > >> > > the classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package. > >> > > > >> > > I have always been curious about the relationship between > >> > > o.a.f.contrib.xx and the flink-contrib module. :) > >> > > > >> > > Best, > >> > > Yanfei > >> > > > >> > > Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年7月25日周二 17:50写道： > >> > > > > >> > > > make sense. > >> > > > > >> > > > Best regards, > >> > > > Jing > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stefan Richter > >> > > > <srich...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler < > ches...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I > >> propose > >> > > to > >> > > > > move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the > >> > classes > >> > > to > >> > > > > o.a.f.state.rocksdb package. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage&source=gmail-imap&ust=1690799128000000&usg=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
