thanks for the clarification

given the fact how flink annotations are used across Flink repo I
don't think it is a right way to not use it here as well...
At the same time they are not used at runtime and I guess could be excluded

I tried with "hello world" code split app and the way of declaring
dependencies as below
and it seems working.
. Could it be a way to go for you?

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
    <artifactId>flink-table-code-splitter</artifactId>
    <version>${code-splitter.version}</version>
    <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
            <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
            <artifactId>flink-core</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
    </exclusions>
</dependency>

PS. IIRC currently there is no circular deps so far since there are
only few modules depending on Calcite
flink-connector-hive, flink-sql-parser, flink-sql-client,
flink-table-calcite-bridge, flink-table-planner

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:09 PM James Duong
<james.du...@improving.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi Sergey,
>
> I would prefer the approach of using the Flink module as a dependency so that 
> fixes are propagated more easily.
>
> From: Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 12:44 AM
> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: Flink code generation porting to Calcite
> Hi James
>
> can you please elaborate about your scenario since I feel getting lost
> with this.
>
> from one side the thread is called
> >Flink code generation porting to Calcite
> from another side it was mentioned
> >We really want to avoid having circular dependencies between Flink and 
> >Calcite.
>
> are you going to use it like a dependency or to make a port of it in Calcite?
> Or may be something else...
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:34 AM James Duong
> <james.du...@improving.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > This is really helpful. The JavaCodeSplitter looks fairly easy to use.
> > Thanks Jark!
> >
> > Right now I’m trying to work out the best way to integrate this module from 
> > an architecture perspective. It looks like there aren’t very many Flink 
> > dependencies within the module.
> >
> > We really want to avoid having circular dependencies between Flink and 
> > Calcite. As you mentioned before, code-splitting is a common need and shows 
> > up in projects with code generation. How would you feel about further 
> > de-coupling the code from Flink? There are a few minor dependencies on 
> > Flink annotations and shaded Preconditions.
> >
> > From: Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wednesday, July 17, 2024 at 7:08 PM
> > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: Flink code generation porting to Calcite
> > Hi James,
> >
> > After reading the comments in CALCITE-3094, I think what you are looking
> > for is the Flink code-splitting tools.
> > Code splitting is a common need for Java code generation and Flink has
> > extracted the code splitting into a
> > separate module "flink-table-code-splitter"[1] with little dependencies.
> > And this is how Flink SQL use it [2].
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-table/flink-table-code-splitter/pom.xml
> > [2]:
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-table/flink-table-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/generated/GeneratedClass.java#L58
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 07:12, James Duong 
> > <james.du...@improving.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Flink developer community,
> > >
> > > I’m contributing to the Apache Calcite project and there’s interest in
> > > making use of Flink’s code generation. See the comments on
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3094
> > >
> > > Would someone be able to point me to where Flink integrates Janino? I
> > > originally thought it would be related to this class:
> > > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.3/api/java/org/apache/flink/table/codegen/CodeGenerator.html
> > >
> > > But I haven’t been able to find this on main.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > Warning: The sender of this message could not be validated and may not be 
> > the actual sender.
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
> Warning: The sender of this message could not be validated and may not be the 
> actual sender.



-- 
Best regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to