Hi,

I see in flink-shaded main we depend
on <netty.tcnative.version>2.0.62.Final</netty.tcnative.version> and we
currently avoid building/distributing flink-shaded-netty-tcnative-static
due to legal issues

> This module is excluded by default since it is not compliant with the
apache license. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-393

netty-tcnative 2.0.62.Final upgraded openssl to 3.1.2 [1]

Openssl 3 introduced a license change to apache 2 [2] so I wondered if it's
now okay to build/deploy flink-shaded-netty-tcnative-static? Then we could
avoid having to build the static lib in the flink core end-to-end tests [3]
and include it in the flink binary distribution for users to access.

1.
https://github.com/netty/netty-tcnative/blob/d70e48a56c4aaa8df86a7de2e275e51aa0cc43a1/pom.xml#L97
2. https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/migration_guide.html
3.
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/4e86d98437480377973f66600c2d5bda907589d6/flink-end-to-end-tests/test-scripts/common_ssl.sh#L82

Thanks,
Rob Young

Reply via email to