That's my fault @Robert Metzger <[email protected]> , since the new FLIP process and a lack of confluent access for non-committers this is a bit tricky to get it sync :)
Gyula On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:17 PM Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote: > In principle I'm +1 on the proposal, but I think the FLIP in the wiki is > not in sync with the Google doc. > For example in the Wiki FlinkStateSnapshotSpec.backoffLimit is missing. > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:27 PM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:14 AM Yuepeng Pan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > Yuepeng Pan > > > > > > At 2024-04-24 16:05:07, "Rui Fan" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >+1(binding) > > > > > > > >Best, > > > >Rui > > > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:03 PM Mate Czagany <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-446: Kubernetes Operator State > > > >> Snapshot CRD [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > > objection or > > > >> insufficient votes. > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-446%3A+Kubernetes+Operator+State+Snapshot+CRD > > > >> [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/q5dzjwj0qk34rbg2sczyypfhokxoc3q7 > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Mate > > > >> > > > > > >
