Hey everyone,

I don't see any immediate blockers, so I'm going to start the release process.

Thanks,
Max

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 8:55 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hey Rui, hey Ryan,
>
> Good points. Non-committers can't directly release but they can assist
> with the release. It would be great to get help from both of you in
> the release process.
>
> I'd be happy to be the release manager for the 1.8 release. As for the
> timing, I think we need to reach consensus in which form to include
> the new memory tuning. Also, considering that Gyula just merged a
> pretty big improvement / refactor of the metric collection code, we
> might want to give it another week. I would target the end of February
> to begin with the release process.
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:48 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Max and Ryan for the volunteering.
> >
> > To Ryan:
> >
> > I'm not sure whether non-flink-committers have permission to release.
> > If I remember correctly, multiple steps of the release process[1] need
> > the apache account, such as: Apache GPG key and Apache Nexus.
> >
> > If the release process needs the committer permission, feel free to
> > assist this release, thanks~
> >
> > To all:
> >
> > Max is one of the very active contributors to the
> > flink-kuberneters-operator
> > project, and he didn't release before. So Max as the release manager
> > makes sense to me.
> >
> > I can assist this release if all of you don't mind. In particular,
> > Autoscaler Standalone 1.8.0 is much improved compared to 1.7.0,
> > and I can help write the related Release note. Besides, I can help
> > check and test this release.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Kubernetes+Operator+Release
> >
> > Best,
> > Rui
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:01 PM Ryan van Huuksloot <
> > ryan.vanhuuksl...@shopify.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I can volunteer to be a release manager. I haven't done it for
> > > Apache/Flink or the operator before so I may be a good candidate.
> > >
> > > Ryan van Huuksloot
> > > Sr. Production Engineer | Streaming Platform
> > > [image: Shopify]
> > > <https://www.shopify.com/?utm_medium=salessignatures&utm_source=hs_email>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 6:06 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's very considerate that you want to volunteer to be the release
> > >> manager, but given that you have already managed one release, I would
> > >> ideally like somebody else to do it. Personally, I haven't managed an
> > >> operator release, although I've done it for Flink itself in the past.
> > >> Nevertheless, it would be nice to have somebody new to the process.
> > >>
> > >> Anyone reading this who wants to try being a release manager, please
> > >> don't be afraid to volunteer. Of course we'll be able to assist. That
> > >> would also be a good opportunity for us to update the docs regarding
> > >> the release process.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Max
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:08 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > If the release is postponed 1-2 more weeks, I could volunteer
> > >> > as the one of the release managers.
> > >> >
> > >> > Best,
> > >> > Rui
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 4:54 AM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Given the proposed timeline was a bit short / rushed I agree with Max
> > >> that
> > >> >> we could wait 1-2 more weeks to wrap up the current outstanding bigger
> > >> >> features around memory tuning and the JDBC state store.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In the meantime it would be great to involve 1-2 new committers (or
> > >> other
> > >> >> contributors) in the operator release process so that we have some
> > >> fresh
> > >> >> eyes on the process.
> > >> >> Would anyone be interested in volunteering to help with the next
> > >> release?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Cheers,
> > >> >> Gyula
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 4:35 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Thanks for starting the discussion Gyula!
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > It comes down to how important the outstanding changes are for the
> > >> >> > release. Both the memory tuning as well as the JDBC changes probably
> > >> >> > need 1-2 weeks realistically to complete the initial spec. For the
> > >> >> > memory tuning, I would prefer merging it in the current state as an
> > >> >> > experimental feature for the release which comes disabled out of the
> > >> >> > box. The reason is that it can already be useful to users who want 
> > >> >> > to
> > >> >> > try it out; we have seen some interest in it. Then for the next
> > >> >> > release we will offer a richer feature set and might enable it by
> > >> >> > default.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Cheers,
> > >> >> > Max
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:53 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Thanks Gyula for driving this release!
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Release 1.8.0 sounds make sense to me.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > As you said, I'm developing the JDBC event handler.
> > >> >> > > Since I'm going on vacation starting this Friday, and I have some
> > >> >> > > other work before I go on vacation. After evaluating my time 
> > >> >> > > today,
> > >> >> > > I found that I cannot complete the development, testing, and
> > >> merging
> > >> >> > > of the JDBC event handler this week. So I tend to put the JDBC
> > >> >> > > event handler in the next version.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Best,
> > >> >> > > Rui
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:42 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > Hi all!
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > I would like to kick off the release planning for the operator
> > >> 1.8.0
> > >> >> > > > release. The last operator release was November 22 last year.
> > >> Since
> > >> >> > then we
> > >> >> > > > have added a number of fixes and improvements to both the
> > >> operator and
> > >> >> > the
> > >> >> > > > autoscaler logic.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > There are a few outstanding PRs currently, including some larger
> > >> >> > features
> > >> >> > > > for the Autoscaler (JDBC event handler, Heap tuning), we have to
> > >> make a
> > >> >> > > > decision regarding those as well whether to include in the
> > >> release or
> > >> >> > not. @Maximilian
> > >> >> > > > Michels <m...@apache.org> , @Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>
> > >> what's your
> > >> >> > > > take regarding those PRs? I generally like to be a bit more
> > >> >> > conservative
> > >> >> > > > with large new features to avoid introducing last minute
> > >> instabilities.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > My proposal would be to aim for the end of this week as the
> > >> freeze date
> > >> >> > > > (Feb 9) and then we can prepare RC1 on monday.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > I am happy to volunteer as a release manager but I am of course
> > >> open to
> > >> >> > > > working together with someone on this.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > What do you think?
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Cheers,
> > >> >> > > > Gyula
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >
> > >>
> > >

Reply via email to