Hi Lu,

You can find information about the FLIP process on our wiki[1]. Please
let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Xuannan

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:36 AM Lu Niu <qqib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> sounds good. Is the requirement to send an email thread about the voting? 
> What else is needed? What's the passing criteria?
>
> Best
> Lu
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:41 PM Xuannan Su <suxuanna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Liu,
>>
>> The voting thread has been open for a long time. We may want to start
>> a new voting thread. WDYT?
>>
>> Best,
>> Xuannan
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:51 AM Lu Niu <qqib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thank you Dong and Xuannan!
>> >
>> > Yes. We can take on this task. Any help during bootstrapping would be 
>> > greatly appreciated! I realize there is already a voting thread "[VOTE] 
>> > FLIP-329: Add operator attribute to specify support for object-reuse". 
>> > What else do we need?
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Lu
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:46 AM Xuannan Su <suxuanna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Lu,
>> >>
>> >> I believe this feature is very useful. However, I currently lack the
>> >> capacity to work on it in the near future. I think it would be great
>> >> if you could take on the task. I am willing to offer assistance if
>> >> there are any questions about the FLIP, or to review the PR if needed.
>> >>
>> >> Please let me know if you are interested in taking over this task. And
>> >> also think that we should start the voting thread if no future
>> >> comments on this FLIP.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Xuannan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:23 PM Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Lu,
>> >> >
>> >> > I am not actively working on Flink and this JIRA recently. If Xuannan 
>> >> > does not plan to work on this anytime soon, I personally think it will 
>> >> > be great if you can help work on this FLIP. Maybe we can start the 
>> >> > voting thread if there is no further comment on this FLIP.
>> >> >
>> >> > Xuannan, what do you think?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Dong
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:03 AM Lu Niu <qqib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is this still under active development? I notice 
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32476 is labeled as 
>> >> >> deprioritized. If this is the case, would it be acceptable for us to 
>> >> >> take on the task?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Best
>> >> >> Lu
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:26 PM Ken Krugler 
>> >> >> <kkrugler_li...@transpac.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hi Dong,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Sorry for not seeing this initially. I did have one question about 
>> >> >>> the description of the issue in the FLIP:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > However, in cases where the upstream and downstream operators do 
>> >> >>> > not store or access references to the input or output records, this 
>> >> >>> > deep-copy overhead becomes unnecessary
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I was interested in getting clarification as to what you meant by “or 
>> >> >>> access references…”, to see if it covered this situation:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> StreamX —forward--> operator1
>> >> >>> StreamX —forward--> operator2
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> If operator1 modifies the record, and object re-use is enabled, then 
>> >> >>> operator2 will see the modified version, right?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> — Ken
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > On Jul 2, 2023, at 7:24 PM, Xuannan Su <suxuanna...@gmail.com> 
>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Hi all,
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Dong(cc'ed) and I are opening this thread to discuss our proposal to
>> >> >>> > add operator attribute to allow operator to specify support for
>> >> >>> > object-reuse [1].
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Currently, the default configuration for pipeline.object-reuse is 
>> >> >>> > set
>> >> >>> > to false to avoid data corruption, which can result in suboptimal
>> >> >>> > performance. We propose adding APIs that operators can utilize to
>> >> >>> > inform the Flink runtime whether it is safe to reuse the emitted
>> >> >>> > records. This enhancement would enable Flink to maximize its
>> >> >>> > performance using the default configuration.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Please refer to the FLIP document for more details about the 
>> >> >>> > proposed
>> >> >>> > design and implementation. We welcome any feedback and opinions on
>> >> >>> > this proposal.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Best regards,
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Dong and Xuannan
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > [1] 
>> >> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=255073749
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> --------------------------
>> >> >>> Ken Krugler
>> >> >>> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
>> >> >>> Custom big data solutions
>> >> >>> Flink & Pinot
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>

Reply via email to