Hi Jing,

Thanks for looking into this

I checked it against opensearch connector [1] and it is green now
Also checked against hbase [2] which is now failing because of a different
issue
however anyway it was able to go further (before it failed at Download
Flink binary task) than when it was not publicly accessible.
Also a had a look at kafka connector [3] where Download Flink binary task
is also completed
Thus i don't see a connector where Download Flink binary is failing, so i
would consider this as resolved

At the same time there is another issue which was mentioned above [4]. It
looks like there were some changes in 1.18.0 like [5], [6] which
potentially could result in this issue
Shouldn't we consider it as a blocker?

[1]
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-opensearch/actions/runs/6312803412?pr=32
[2]
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-hbase/actions/runs/6210320267/job/17518738266
[3]
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-kafka/actions/runs/6453974340/job/17518572643
[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33186
[5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32996
[6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32907


On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Ververica has made the files publicly accessible. Could anyone check if any
> connector build works again?
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 9:07 AM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sergey and devs,
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I am open to discuss that. I
> > have the following thoughts:
> >
> > 1. Like I already mentioned in many other threads, build issues in
> > downstream repos should not block upstream release. I understand the
> > concern that developers want to have stable connectors. But it violates
> the
> > intention of connector externalization.
> > 2. It is expensive to download Flink jar(roughly 500M) from S3 for each
> PR
> > and nightly build of each connector. Does it make sense to leverage [1].
> > Many Flink docs have been using it.
> > 3. I will check internally at Ververica to see if we could make the file
> > publicly accessible to temporarily solve this issue.
> >
> > Looking forward to your feedback.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jing
> >
> > [1] https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:03 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I've just opened a PR for the release announcement [1] and I am looking
> >> forward to reviews and feedback.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Konstantin
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/680
> >>
> >> Am Fr., 6. Okt. 2023 um 11:03 Uhr schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin <
> >> snuyan...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> > sorry for not mentioning it in previous mail
> >> >
> >> > based on the reason above I'm
> >> > -1 (non-binding)
> >> >
> >> > also there is one more issue [1]
> >> > which blocks all the externalised connectors testing against the most
> >> > recent commits in
> >> > to corresponding branches
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33175
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 11:19 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks for creating RC1
> >> > >
> >> > > * Downloaded artifacts
> >> > > * Built from sources
> >> > > * Verified checksums and gpg signatures
> >> > > * Verified versions in pom files
> >> > > * Checked NOTICE, LICENSE files
> >> > >
> >> > > The strange thing I faced is
> >> > >
> >> CheckpointAfterAllTasksFinishedITCase.testRestoreAfterSomeTasksFinished
> >> > > fails on AZP [1]
> >> > >
> >> > > which looks like it is related to [2], [3] fixed  in 1.18.0 (not
> 100%
> >> > > sure).
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33186
> >> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32996
> >> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32907
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:53 PM Ferenc Csaky
> >> <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Thanks everyone for the efforts!
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Checked the following:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - Downloaded artifacts
> >> > >> - Built Flink from source
> >> > >> - Verified checksums/signatures
> >> > >> - Verified NOTICE, LICENSE files
> >> > >> - Deployed dummy SELECT job via SQL gateway on standalone cluster,
> >> > things
> >> > >> seemed fine according to the log files
> >> > >>
> >> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Best,
> >> > >> Ferenc
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ------- Original Message -------
> >> > >> On Friday, September 29th, 2023 at 22:12, Gabor Somogyi <
> >> > >> gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Thanks for the efforts!
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > * Verified versions in the poms
> >> > >> > * Built from source
> >> > >> > * Verified checksums and signatures
> >> > >> > * Started basic workloads with kubernetes operator
> >> > >> > * Verified NOTICE and LICENSE files
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > G
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, 18:16 Matthias Pohl
> >> > matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > Thanks for creating RC1. I did the following checks:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > * Downloaded artifacts
> >> > >> > > * Built Flink from sources
> >> > >> > > * Verified SHA512 checksums GPG signatures
> >> > >> > > * Compared checkout with provided sources
> >> > >> > > * Verified pom file versions
> >> > >> > > * Went over NOTICE file/pom files changes without finding
> >> anything
> >> > >> > > suspicious
> >> > >> > > * Deployed standalone session cluster and ran WordCount example
> >> in
> >> > >> batch
> >> > >> > > and streaming: Nothing suspicious in log files found
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > +1 (binding)
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Etienne Chauchot
> >> > >> echauc...@apache.org
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > Hi all,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Thanks to the team for this RC.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > I did a quick check of this RC against user pipelines (1)
> coded
> >> > with
> >> > >> > > > DataSet (even if deprecated and soon removed), DataStream and
> >> SQL
> >> > >> APIs
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > based on the small scope of this test, LGTM
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > [1] https://github.com/echauchot/tpcds-benchmark-flink
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Best
> >> > >> > > > Etienne
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Le 28/09/2023 à 19:35, Jing Ge a écrit :
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Hi everyone,
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > The RC1 for Apache Flink 1.18.0 has been created. The
> related
> >> > >> voting
> >> > >> > > > > process will be triggered once the announcement is ready.
> The
> >> > RC1
> >> > >> has
> >> > >> > > > > all
> >> > >> > > > > the artifacts that we would typically have for a release,
> >> except
> >> > >> for
> >> > >> > > > > the
> >> > >> > > > > release note and the website pull request for the release
> >> > >> announcement.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > The following contents are available for your review:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > - Confirmation of no benchmarks regression at the
> thread[1].
> >> > >> > > > > - The preview source release and binary convenience
> releases
> >> > [2],
> >> > >> which
> >> > >> > > > > are signed with the key with fingerprint
> 96AE0E32CBE6E0753CE6
> >> > [3].
> >> > >> > > > > - all artifacts that would normally be deployed to the
> Maven
> >> > >> > > > > Central Repository [4].
> >> > >> > > > > - source code tag "release-1.18.0-rc1" [5]
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Your help testing the release will be greatly appreciated!
> >> And
> >> > >> we'll
> >> > >> > > > > create the rc1 release and the voting thread as soon as all
> >> the
> >> > >> efforts
> >> > >> > > > > are
> >> > >> > > > > finished.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > [1]
> >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/yxyphglwwvq57wcqlfrnk3qo9t3sr2ro
> >> > >> > > > > [2]
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc1/
> >> > >> > > > > [3]https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >> > >> > > > > [4]
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1657
> >> > >> > > > > [5]
> >> > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.18.0-rc1
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Best regards,
> >> > >> > > > > Qingsheng, Sergei, Konstantin and Jing
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > > Sergey
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Sergey
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> https://twitter.com/snntrable
> >> https://github.com/knaufk
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to