Hello

(apologies if this is a duplicate reply)

I was working with Karthi on this connector, and I have taken over the
development.
We have a working version we would like to submit to the community.

The renumbered FLIP-312 is also updated with more details [1].
Happy to answer any questions.

Regards
Lorenzo

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-312%3A+Prometheus+Sink+Connector

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, 13:06 Ahmed Hamdy, <hamdy10...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Karthi
> Is this FLIP still in progress? I see the FLIP not updated & couldn't find
> open JIRAs.
> I am happy to take over if you are no longer working on this.
> Best Regards
> Ahmed Hamdy
>
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 14:49, Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > For example, a user might want to read in logs, perform some
> aggregations
> > and publish it into a metrics store for visualisation. This might be a
> > great use-case for reducing the cardinality of metrics!
> >
> > I can see that. What I would like to see in the FLIP is a proposal on the
> > boundaries of the metrics reporter vs the Prometheus sink. I think it's
> > important that we make clear when to use a metric reporter and when not.
> I
> > can imagine that there will be Flink users who think that they can get
> data
> > from the metric reporter, make aggregrations in Flink and then store it
> > using the Prometheus sink.
> >
> > Overall, I think more context must be added to the FLIP, especially on
> the
> > motivation.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 4:28 PM Karthi Thyagarajan <
> kar...@karthitect.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lijie
> > >
> > > Thank you for pointing this out. I've corrected it [1]. Also, this page
> > > [2] still shows 178 and 229 as available, which is why I picked it up.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Karthi
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-312%3A+Prometheus+Sink+Connector
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals
> > >
> > > On May 15, 2023, at 9:37 PM, Lijie Wang <wangdachui9...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Karthi,
> > >
> > > I think you are using a wrong FLIP id, the FLIP-229 has already be
> > used[1].
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-229%3A+Introduces+Join+Hint+for+Flink+SQL+Batch+Job
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Lijie
> > >
> > > Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 04:44写道:
> > >
> > > Hi Karthi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the FLIP and opening up the discussion. My main question is:
> > why
> > > should we create a separate connector and not use and/or improve the
> > > existing integrations with Prometheus? I would like to understand more
> so
> > > that it can be added to the motivation of the FLIP.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:03 PM Karthi Thyagarajan <
> > kar...@karthitect.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-229: Prometheus
> Sink
> > > > Connector [1] where we propose to provide a sink connector for
> > Prometheus
> > > > [2] based on the Async Sink [3]. Looking forward to comments and
> > > feedback.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-229%3A+Prometheus+Sink+Connector
> > > > [2] https://prometheus.io/
> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to