+1 nothing to add @Austin It sounds reasonable. But this topic might deserve a dedicated discussion thread, I think.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 12:52 AM Austin Cawley-Edwards < austin.caw...@gmail.com> wrote: > It doesn't need to be part of the Flink 2.0 release perse, but starting to > wonder if we'd get more bang for our buck if we started fresh with a v2 > REST API vs. one-off cleanups of the current v1 API. @Chesnay Schepler > <ches...@apache.org> -- wdyt? > > The v1 REST API seemed to grow naturally from its original use case of > supporting the Web UI iiuc, but now another of the core use cases is > operational (e.g., supporting the K8s Operator). For the operational use > case, it is clear that this wasn't the original design goal (e.g., cases > exist that require parsing the included Java stack trace to determine what > to do). Maybe @Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> also has some > experience/suggestions to share on if this would be valuable. (also happy > to start a new thread, sorry for co-opting this one) > > > Austin >
