+1 (binding)

The FLIP LGTM, thanks Panos!

Regards,
Roman


On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:33 PM Hong Teoh <hlteo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you for driving this effort, Panagiotis.
>
> Regards,
> Hong
>
>
> > On 20 Apr 2023, at 12:16, David Morávek <d...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the update!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > D.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:50 AM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I see that the FLIP has been updated, thanks Panos!
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Piotrek
> >>
> >> śr., 19 kwi 2023 o 13:49 Piotr Nowojski <piotr.nowoj...@gmail.com>
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> +1 to what David wrote. I think we need to update the FLIP and extend
> the
> >>> voting?
> >>>
> >>> Piotrek
> >>>
> >>> śr., 19 kwi 2023 o 09:06 David Morávek <d...@apache.org> napisał(a):
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Panos,
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems that most recent discussions (e.g. changing the semantics of
> >> the
> >>>> config option) are not reflected in the FLIP. Can you please
> >> double-check
> >>>> that this is the correct version?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> D.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:24 AM Panagiotis Garefalakis <
> >> pga...@apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I want to start the vote for FLIP-304: Pluggable Failure Enrichers
> [1]
> >>>> --
> >>>>> discussed as part of [2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FLIP-304 introduces a pluggable interface allowing users to add
> custom
> >>>>> logic and enrich failures with custom metadata labels.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Thursday, 20th of April
> >> 2023,
> >>>>> 12:30 PST) unless there is an objection or insufficient votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-304%3A+Pluggable+Failure+Enrichers
> >>>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zs9n9p8d7tyvnq4yyxhc8zvq1k2c1hvs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Panagiotis
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to