Hi Lincoln,

Thanks for bringing this to the discussion. +1 for the FLIP.

Best,
Jane

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:23 PM Aitozi <gjying1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > we can initiate corresponding support issues for
> specific connectors to follow up on support after finalizing the API
> changes
>
> Make sense to me!
>
> Best,
> Aitozi.
>
> Lincoln Lee <lincoln.8...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 15:05写道:
>
> > Thanks Jingsong & Hang,
> >
> > Using Optional<int[][]> as the return value is a good idea. Previously, I
> > hoped to keep the style of the LookupTableSource.LookupContext#getKeys as
> > consistent as possible, but the getKeys is actually non-empty when used,
> so
> > I support updating to Optional<int[][]>.  I'll update the flip doc and
> poc
> > later tonight.
> >
> > Best,
> > Lincoln Lee
> >
> >
> > Lincoln Lee <lincoln.8...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 14:53写道:
> >
> > > Hi Aitozi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your feedback!  Yes, including HBase and JDBC connector,
> they
> > > can be considered for support in the next step (JDBC as as a standard
> > > protocol supported not only in traditional databases, but also in more
> > and
> > > more new types of storage). Considering the ongoing externalizing of
> > > connectors and the release cycles of the connectors are decoupled with
> > the
> > > release cycle of Flink, we can initiate corresponding support issues
> for
> > > specific connectors to follow up on support after finalizing the API
> > > changes, WDYT?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Lincoln Lee
> > >
> > >
> > > Hang Ruan <ruanhang1...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 12:14写道:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Lincoln,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for bringing this up. It looks good to me. I also agree with
> > >> Jingsong's suggestion.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Hang
> > >>
> > >> Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 11:15写道:
> > >>
> > >> > Wow, we have 300 FLIPs...
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks Lincoln,
> > >> >
> > >> > Have you considered returning an Optional<int[][]>?
> > >> >
> > >> > Empty array looks a little weird to me.
> > >> >
> > >> > Best,
> > >> > Jingsong
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:32 AM Aitozi <gjying1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi Lincoln,
> > >> > >     Thank you for sharing this FLIP. Overall, it looks good to
> me. I
> > >> have
> > >> > > one question: with the introduction of this interface,
> > >> > > will any existing Flink connectors need to be updated in order to
> > take
> > >> > > advantage of its capabilities? For example, HBase.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年3月7日周二 10:01写道:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Thanks. It makes sense to me.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > Yuxia
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ----- 原始邮件 -----
> > >> > > > 发件人: "Lincoln Lee" <lincoln.8...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >> > > > 发送时间: 星期一, 2023年 3 月 06日 下午 10:26:26
> > >> > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-300: Add targetColumns to
> > >> > DynamicTableSink#Context
> > >> > > > to solve the null overwrite problem of partial-insert
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > hi yuxia,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks for your feedback and tracking the issue of update
> > statement!
> > >> > I've
> > >> > > > updated the FLIP[1] and also the poc[2].
> > >> > > > Since the bug and flip are orthogonal, we can focus on
> finalizing
> > >> the
> > >> > api
> > >> > > > changes first, and then work on the flip implementation and
> bugfix
> > >> > > > separately, WDYT?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [1]
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=240885081
> > >> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22041
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best,
> > >> > > > Lincoln Lee
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年3月6日周一 21:21写道:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi, Lincoln.
> > >> > > > > Thanks for bringing this up. +1 for this FLIP, it's helpful
> for
> > >> > external
> > >> > > > > storage system to implement partial update.
> > >> > > > > The FLIP looks good to me. I only want to add one comment,
> > update
> > >> > > > > statement also doesn't support updating nested column, I have
> > >> created
> > >> > > > > FLINK-31344[1] to track it.
> > >> > > > > Maybe we also need to explain it in this FLIP.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31344
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > > Yuxia
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > ----- 原始邮件 -----
> > >> > > > > 发件人: "Lincoln Lee" <lincoln.8...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >> > > > > 发送时间: 星期五, 2023年 3 月 03日 下午 12:22:19
> > >> > > > > 主题: [DISCUSS] FLIP-300: Add targetColumns to
> > >> > DynamicTableSink#Context to
> > >> > > > > solve the null overwrite problem of partial-insert
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > This FLIP[1] aims to support connectors in avoiding
> overwriting
> > >> > > > non-target
> > >> > > > > columns with null values when processing partial column
> updates,
> > >> we
> > >> > > > propose
> > >> > > > > adding information on the target column list to
> > >> > DynamicTableSink#Context.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > FLINK-18726[2] supports inserting statements with specified
> > column
> > >> > list,
> > >> > > > it
> > >> > > > > fills null values (or potentially declared default values in
> the
> > >> > future)
> > >> > > > > for columns not appearing in the column list of insert
> statement
> > >> to
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > target table.
> > >> > > > > But this behavior does not satisfy some partial column update
> > >> > > > requirements
> > >> > > > > of some storage systems which allow storing null values. The
> > >> problem
> > >> > is
> > >> > > > > that connectors cannot distinguish whether the null value of a
> > >> > column is
> > >> > > > > really from the user's data or whether it is a null value
> > >> populated
> > >> > > > because
> > >> > > > > of partial insert behavior.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Looking forward to your comments or feedback.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > [1]
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=240885081
> > >> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18726
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Best,
> > >> > > > > Lincoln Lee
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to