Hi, Matthias Thanks for bringing this discussion.
When I wanted to trigger a CI pipeline, my first thought was to submit a PR to flink repo. But considering that the PR was not intended to be merged in, it might interfere with others. So I tried to retrieve how to run the CI pipeline without PR, Then I found this documentation and flows it's suggestion to submit a PR to flink-mirror. Sorry for making noise in the slack channel. +1 for removing this section in the docs. Best, Weihua On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:17 PM Matthias Pohl <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Weihua Hu [1] notified me of a section in Flink's Azure Pipeline > documentation [2] where it's suggested to create PRs against > flink-ci/mirror as a workaround if you're not having a private Azure > Pipeline account and want to run CI with your code changes. Even though > it's a viable solution it does generate noise in the Slack channel for > build failure (#builds). Additionally, I don't see any extra value in > comparison to using your own fork and creating a PR on your branch against > the apache/flink repo. CI will be picked up by Flink's CiBot. Or am I > missing something? > > I couldn't find any ML discussion on that matter. I suggest removing this > section in the docs. > > Best, > Matthias > > [1] > https://github.com/flink-ci/flink-mirror/pull/16#issuecomment-1451183958 > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Azure+Pipelines#AzurePipelines-AzurePipelineUsageRestrictions > > -- > > [image: Aiven] <https://www.aiven.io> > > *Matthias Pohl* > Opensource Software Engineer, *Aiven* > matthias.p...@aiven.io <i...@aiven.io> | +49 170 9869525 > aiven.io <https://www.aiven.io> | <https://www.facebook.com/aivencloud > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiven/> < > https://twitter.com/aiven_io> > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH* > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B >
