+1 (non-binding)

* Build from source code.
* Launched a standalone cluster with examples for TopSpeedWindowing.
* The configuration of changelog state backend in web UI is shown as
expected.
* The files of changelog state backend are scattered into separate
directories by job id as expected.

BTW, the "Add New" button in "Submit New Job" tab can't work in my local
standalone cluster, is this as expected?

Best,
Yanfei

JunRui Lee <jrlee....@gmail.com> 于2022年10月25日周二 09:32写道:

> +1 (non-binding) for this candidate
>
>   *   Built from the source code.
>   *   Ran batch wordcount jobs with slow nodes of different source types on
> the yarn cluster.
>   *   The new source speculative execution works as expected, the result is
> expected, no suspicious log output.
>   *   Slow nodes are successfully added to the blocklist and subsequently
> removed as expected.
>   *   Ran large parallelism batch jobs and performance does not degrade.
>
> Best,
> JunRui
>
> yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2022年10月25日周二 09:23写道:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > * Build from source
> > * Use Flink Sql client create catalog/tables
> > * Use Hive dialect to run some queries and insert statements
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yuxia
> >
> > ----- 原始邮件 -----
> > 发件人: "Teoh, Hong" <lian...@amazon.co.uk.INVALID>
> > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > 发送时间: 星期二, 2022年 10 月 25日 上午 4:35:39
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > * Hashes and Signatures look good
> > * All required files on dist.apache.org
> > * Tag is present in Github
> > * Verified source archive does not contain any binary files
> > * Source archive builds using maven
> > * Deployed standalone session cluster and ran TopSpeedWindowing example
> in
> > streaming with checkpointing enabled. Looks ok
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hong
> >
> > On 24/10/2022, 16:06, "Gyula Fóra" <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> > not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> >     +1 (binding)
> >
> >     * Verified checksums/GPG signatures
> >     * Built from source
> >     * Tested with Kubernetes operator, including simple jobs,
> > checkpointing etc.
> >     * Metrics, logs look good.
> >
> >     Gyula
> >
> >     On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:54 PM Matthias Pohl
> >     <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >     > +1 (non-binding)
> >     >
> >     > * Downloaded artifacts
> >     > * Verified checksums/GPG signatures
> >     > * Compared checkout with provided sources
> >     > * Verified pom file versions
> >     > * Went over NOTICE file/pom files changes without finding anything
> >     > suspicious
> >     > * Build Flink from sources
> >     > * Deployed standalone session cluster and ran WordCount example in
> > batch
> >     > and streaming: Nothing suspicious in log files found
> >     >
> >     > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:51 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <
> snuyan...@gmail.com
> > >
> >     > wrote:
> >     >
> >     > > +1 (non-binding)
> >     > >
> >     > > - checked hashes and signatures
> >     > > - built from sources
> >     > > - started cluster, ran different simple jobs
> >     > > - checked sql client
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:14 PM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >     > >
> >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >     > > >
> >     > > > - verified signatures and hashsums
> >     > > > - built from source code succeeded
> >     > > > - checked all dependency artifacts are 1.16
> >     > > > - started a cluster, ran a wordcount job, the result is
> > expected, no
> >     > > > suspicious log output
> >     > > > - started SQL Gateway, tested several rest APIs, the SQL query
> > results
> >     > > are
> >     > > > expected
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Best,
> >     > > > Leonard Xu
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > > 2022年10月24日 下午8:49,Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >     > > > >
> >     > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >     > > > >
> >     > > > > - verify signatures and checksums
> >     > > > > - no binaries found in source archive
> >     > > > > - build from source code
> >     > > > > - verify python wheel package contents
> >     > > > > - pip install apache-flink-libraries and apache-flink wheel
> > packages
> >     > > > > - thread mode works as expected in Python DataStream API
> >     > > > > - the Python DataStream Window works as expected
> >     > > > > - the Python Sideoutput works as expected
> >     > > > >
> >     > > > > Best,
> >     > > > > Xingbo
> >     > > > >
> >     > > > > Lijie Wang <wangdachui9...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月24日周一
> 16:09写道:
> >     > > > >
> >     > > > >> +1 (non-binding) for this candidate
> >     > > > >>
> >     > > > >>  *   Built from the source code.
> >     > > > >>  *   Verified the signature and checksum
> >     > > > >>  *   Ran both streaming/batch jobs on yarn cluster
> >     > > > >>  *   The new speculative execution works as expected
> >     > > > >>
> >     > > > >> Best,
> >     > > > >> Lijie
> >     > > > >>
> >     > > > >> Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2022年10月22日周六 15:20写道:
> >     > > > >>
> >     > > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>>  *   build from the source code.
> >     > > > >>>  *   verified the signature of the release binaries.
> >     > > > >>>  *   launched a standalone cluster with examples for both
> >     > > > >> streaming/batch
> >     > > > >>> execution modes.
> >     > > > >>>  *   checked rocksdb's log would exist under Flink's
> default
> > log
> >     > > > folder.
> >     > > > >>>  *   reviewed the flink-web PR
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>> Best
> >     > > > >>> Yun Tang
> >     > > > >>> ________________________________
> >     > > > >>> From: Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
> >     > > > >>> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 18:29
> >     > > > >>> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> >     > > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>> +1 (binding) for this release candidate
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>> - verified checksum & signature
> >     > > > >>> - build from source
> >     > > > >>> - tried example jobs with standalone cluster, web ui & logs
> > look
> >     > good
> >     > > > >>> - the new completed jobs & history server features work as
> > expected
> >     > > > >>> - the new hybrid shuffle mode works as expected
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>> Best,
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>> Xintong
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:09 AM godfrey he <
> > godfre...@gmail.com>
> >     > > > wrote:
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>>> +1 to make 1.16.0 released as soon as possible,
> >     > > > >>>> it's been more than two months since feature freeze,
> >     > > > >>>> 1.17 already starts kicking off. We can fix the critical
> > bugs in
> >     > > > >> 1.16.1.
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > > >>>> Best,
> >     > > > >>>> Godfrey
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > > >>>> Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月21日周五
> > 09:57写道:
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>> BTW, missing 1.16.0 is probably not that bad. From my
> > experience,
> >     > > the
> >     > > > >>>> x.y.0
> >     > > > >>>>> releases are usually considered unstable and are mainly
> for
> >     > trying
> >     > > > >> out
> >     > > > >>>>> purposes. Most users do not upgrade to the new version in
> >     > > production
> >     > > > >>>> until
> >     > > > >>>>> the x.y.1/2 releases, which are considered more stable.
> As
> > this
> >     > > > >> bug-fix
> >     > > > >>>> is
> >     > > > >>>>> making 1.16.1 anyway, it barely misses anything.
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>> Best,
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>> Xintong
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:10 AM Danny Cranmer <
> >     > > > >> dannycran...@apache.org
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>> We had a similar situation for Flink 1.15.1 where a
> >     > non-regression
> >     > > > >>>>>> "critical" bug was impacting a connector [1]. We decided
> > to not
> >     > > > >> block
> >     > > > >>>> the
> >     > > > >>>>>> release to address this issue. Based on this, I am
> > inclined to
> >     > > > >> agree
> >     > > > >>>> with
> >     > > > >>>>>> Martijn and move forward with the release. This bug is
> not
> >     > marked
> >     > > > >> as
> >     > > > >>> a
> >     > > > >>>>>> "blocker" and we should respect that.
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>> I am happy to manage a 1.15.3 or 1.16.1 release follow
> up
> > to
> >     > > > >> address
> >     > > > >>>> these
> >     > > > >>>>>> concerns.
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>> [1]
> >     > > > >>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8hxz5n6x2v4c6v8z33hdz51h1bhn768d
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > > >>>>>> Danny
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:01 PM Martijn Visser <
> >     > > > >>>> martijnvis...@apache.org>
> >     > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>> Taking in this fix would require us to cancel RC2 and
> > create
> >     > > > >>> another
> >     > > > >>>>>>> release candidate. We are already long-overdue on the
> > Flink
> >     > 1.16
> >     > > > >>>> release.
> >     > > > >>>>>>> Given that 1.15.3 is not yet released, it can't be a
> > regression
> >     > > > >>>> compared
> >     > > > >>>>>> to
> >     > > > >>>>>>> the current situation of 1.15.2. The Flink Delta
> > connector is
> >     > not
> >     > > > >>>> part of
> >     > > > >>>>>>> the ASF Flink community so it can't be considered a
> > blocker
> >     > from
> >     > > > >> a
> >     > > > >>>> ASF
> >     > > > >>>>>>> Flink community perspective.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>> I do understand the pain. I'm curious what others think
> > if this
> >     > > > >> is
> >     > > > >>>> worthy
> >     > > > >>>>>>> of cancelling the release candidate.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, Martijn
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Chmielewski <
> >     > > > >>>>>>> krzysiek.chmielew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> Thank you all for response,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> however i think you may miss a bigger context
> regarding
> > those
> >     > 3
> >     > > > >>>>>> tickets.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> Those 3 tickets [29509, 29512, 29627] are part of a
> > bigger
> >     > > > >> thing.
> >     > > > >>>> They
> >     > > > >>>>>>> are
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> fixing 1.15 Sink V2 issue, where Task manager will not
> > start
> >     > > > >>> after
> >     > > > >>>>>>> recovery
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> for Sink topology with Global Committer. The problem
> was
> >     > > > >>> described
> >     > > > >>>> by
> >     > > > >>>>>> me
> >     > > > >>>>>>> in
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> this thread [1]. We need all three to fix the problem.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> All three tickets were merged into 1.15 release branch
> > and
> >     > will
> >     > > > >>> be
> >     > > > >>>>>>> included
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> in 1.15.3 probably, however 1.16 will be missing one
> fix
> >     > > > >> (29627).
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> In other words, there will be a regression between
> 1.16
> > and
> >     > > > >>> 1.15.3.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> Additionally for now this issue is blocking Flink
> > migration
> >     > for
> >     > > > >>>> Delta
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> connector [2].
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> We need to migrate because Flink 1.14 has another Sink
> > problem
> >     > > > >>> with
> >     > > > >>>>>> data
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> loss during Sink Recovery with Global Committer [3]
> and
> > this
> >     > > > >> one
> >     > > > >>>> most
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> likely will not be fixed since 1.14 support is ending.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> Forgive my if I'm wrong but what do you mean by " we
> > won't
> >     > > > >> block
> >     > > > >>>> 1.16.0
> >     > > > >>>>>>> on
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> this." Fix is merged so couldn't we just cherry pick
> > 1.16
> >     > merge
> >     > > > >>>> commit
> >     > > > >>>>>> to
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> 1.16.0's RC2?
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> [1]
> >     > > > >>>>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/otscy199g1l9t3llvo8s2slntyn2r1jc
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> [2]
> > https://github.com/delta-io/connectors/tree/master/flink
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29589
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> Krzysztof Chmielewski
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> czw., 20 paź 2022 o 16:13 Xingbo Huang <
> h...@apache.org>
> >     > > > >>>> napisał(a):
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> When I was building rc2, I tried to search whether
> > issues
> >     > > > >> with
> >     > > > >>>> `fix
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> version` of 1.16.0 have not been closed.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627
> was
> > missed
> >     > > > >>>> because
> >     > > > >>>>>>> the
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> `fix version` was not marked. I agree with Martijn
> and
> >     > > > >> Xintong
> >     > > > >>>> that
> >     > > > >>>>>> we
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> won't block 1.16.0 on this.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Xingbo
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月20日周四
> > 18:23写道:
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> FLINK-29627 is merged after rc2 being created,
> that's
> > why
> >     > > > >> it
> >     > > > >>>>>> doesn't
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> appear
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> in the change list. See the commit history of rc2
> [1].
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> It's unfortunate this fix didn't make the 1.16.0
> > release
> >     > > > >> (if
> >     > > > >>>> rc2 is
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> approved). However, I agree with Martijn that we
> > should not
> >     > > > >>>> further
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> block
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.16.0 on this. If there's no other blockers
> > discovered in
> >     > > > >>> the
> >     > > > >>>> rc2,
> >     > > > >>>>>>> the
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> fix
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> of FLINK-29627 will be shipped in 1.16.1.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Xintong
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >     > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commits/release-1.16.0-rc2
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 6:16 PM Krzysztof
> Chmielewski
> > <
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> krzysiek.chmielew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks  Martijn,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> just to clarify from my end,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> All three tickets,  [1] [2] [3] are fixed and
> merged
> > to
> >     > > > >>> 1.16
> >     > > > >>>>>> branch
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> already. I just noticed that one of them [3] is not
> > on
> >     > > > >>>> included
> >     > > > >>>>>> in
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> the
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> change list. Hence my email.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29509
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29512
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Krzysztof Chmielewski
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> czw., 20 paź 2022 o 11:51 Martijn Visser <
> >     > > > >>>>>> martijnvis...@apache.org
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Given that this issue already exists in previous
> > Flink
> >     > > > >>>>>> versions,
> >     > > > >>>>>>> I
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> don't
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> think it's a blocker for 1.16. We should get it
> > fixed
> >     > > > >>> (all
> >     > > > >>>> of
> >     > > > >>>>>> the
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> tickets)
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> so it will be addressed in a new Flink 1.15
> > version, in
> >     > > > >>>> Flink
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> 1.16.1
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> and
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> course Flink 1.17.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:47 AM Krzysztof
> > Chmielewski
> >     > > > >> <
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> krzysiek.chmielew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to ask about [1] ticket with PR [2].
> > It
> >     > > > >>> was
> >     > > > >>>>>> merged
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> to
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.16
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch today but I do not see it on the
> >     > > > >> change
> >     > > > >>>> list.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is closely related to [3] and [4] that are on
> > the
> >     > > > >>>> change
> >     > > > >>>>>>> list.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> However
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to fully fix Sink architecture issue we need all
> 3
> >     > > > >>>> tickets
> >     > > > >>>>>> [1],
> >     > > > >>>>>>>> [3]
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> and
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >     > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21115
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >     > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29509
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >     > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29512
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Krzysztof Chmielewski
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 20 paź 2022 o 11:21 Xingbo Huang <
> >     > > > >> h...@apache.org
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate
> #2
> >     > > > >>> for
> >     > > > >>>> the
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> version
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.16.0,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
> provide
> >     > > > >>>> specific
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> comments)
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your
> >     > > > >>> review,
> >     > > > >>>>>> which
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> includes:
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> >     > > > >>>> convenience
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> releases
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are
> signed
> >     > > > >>>> with the
> >     > > > >>>>>>> key
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> with
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint 3C2C9FFB59DF9F3E [3],
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
> > Central
> >     > > > >>>>>>> Repository
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [4],
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.16.0-rc2" [5],
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release
> and
> >     > > > >>>> adding
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> announcement
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> blog
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It
> is
> >     > > > >>>> adopted
> >     > > > >>>>>> by
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> majority
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chesnay, Martijn, Godfrey & Xingbo
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12351275
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.16.0-rc2
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >     > > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1541
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >     > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.16.0-rc2
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/574
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > > >>>
> >     > > > >>
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     > > --
> >     > > Best regards,
> >     > > Sergey
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
>

Reply via email to