Thank you for the response, Yuxia!

Shengkai, I would like to learn more about nearest and a bit more distant
plans about development of the SQL Gateway and the SQL Client.
Do you have a description of the work planned or maybe can share general
thoughts about the Authentication module, or Persistent Gateway.
How can the authentication part be addressed on the SQL Client side?

Regards,
-Alexey


On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:24 PM yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> wrote:

> > In what Flink’s release the connection from SQL Client to the Gateway is
> expected to be added?
> Flink 1.17
>
> > “Authentication module” (2) and “Persistent Gateway” (4) as
> possible future work. Were there any recent discussions on these subjects?
> No recent discussions on these subjects, but I think it'll come in Flink
> 1.17
>
> > Another related topic: are there ideas around making SQL Gateway a
> multi-tenant
> component?
> Yes.
>
> Shengkaiis the maintainer of SQL Client and SQL gateway, maybe he can
> provide more information.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
>
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "Alexey Leonov-Vendrovskiy" <vendrov...@gmail.com>
> 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> 发送时间: 星期四, 2022年 10 月 13日 下午 12:33:08
> 主题: SQL Gateway and SQL Client
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’m Alexey from Confluent. This is my first email in this discussion list.
> I’m rather new to Flink, and to local customs of communication. I want to
> dive deeper and hopefully get more involved over time.
>
> Currently I have a few questions around SQL Gateway and SQL Client.
> Specifically I wanted to learn what is the vision around the nearest future
> of these two components.
>
> In what Flink’s release the connection from SQL Client to the Gateway is
> expected to be added? I was looking at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29486, and recently it got
> renamed from “Enable SQL Client to Connect SQL Gateway in Remote Mode” to
> “Introduce Client Parser to get statement type”.  I did some search, but
> didn’t find a good place where the client's work in this direction is
> discussed or tracked.
>
> A couple questions about the SQL Gateway. The FLIP-91
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-91%3A+Support+SQL+Gateway#FLIP91:SupportSQLGateway-Futurework
> >
> mentions “Authentication module” (2) and “Persistent Gateway” (4) as
> possible future work. Were there any recent discussions on these subjects?
> Or maybe there are some ideas how to move these directions forward? Another
> related topic: are there ideas around making SQL Gateway a multi-tenant
> component?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alexey
>

Reply via email to