+1

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:03 PM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 from my end to include the operator in the related Kubernetes sections
> of the Flink docs
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:31 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't see a reason for why we shouldn't at least mention the operator
> > in the kubernetes docs.
> >
> > On 12/10/2022 16:25, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > Hi Devs!
> > >
> > > I would like to start a discussion about referencing the Flink
> Kubernetes
> > > Operator directly from the Flink Kubernetes deployment documentation.
> > >
> > > Currently the Flink deployment/resource provider docs provide some
> > > information for the Standalone and Native Kubernetes integration
> without
> > > any reference to the operator.
> > >
> > > I think we reached a point with the operator where we should provide a
> > bit
> > > more visibility and value to the users by directly proposing to use the
> > > operator when considering Flink on Kubernetes. We should definitely
> keep
> > > the current docs but make the point that for most users the easiest way
> > to
> > > use Flink on Kubernetes is probably through the operator (where they
> can
> > > now benefit from both standalone and native integration under the
> hood).
> > > This should help us avoid cases where a new user completely misses the
> > > existence of the operator when starting out based on the Flink docs.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Gyula
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to