Thanks Qingsheng for starting this thread.

+1 on reverting sink metric name and releasing 1.15.3 to fix this inconsistent 
behavior.


Best,
Leonard





> 2022年10月10日 下午3:06,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Thanks for discovering this problem, Qingsheng!
> 
> I'm also +1 for reverting the breaking changes. 
> 
> IIUC, currently, the behavior of "numXXXOut" metrics of the new and old sink 
> is inconsistent. 
> We have to break one of them to have consistent behavior. Sink V2 is an 
> evolving API which is just introduced in 1.15. 
> I think it makes sense to break the unstable API instead of the stable API 
> which many connectors and users depend on.
> 
> Best,
> Jark
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 11:36, Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:jingsongl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks for driving, Qingsheng.
> 
> +1 for reverting sink metric name.
> 
> We often forget that metric is also one of the important APIs.
> 
> +1 for releasing 1.15.3 to fix this.
> 
> Best,
> Jingsong
> 
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 11:35 PM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com 
> <mailto:becket....@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for raising the discussion, Qingsheng,
> >
> > +1 on reverting the breaking changes.
> >
> > In addition, we might want to release a 1.15.3 to fix this and update the 
> > previous release docs with this known issue, so that users can upgrade to 
> > 1.15.3 when they hit it. It would also be good to add some backwards 
> > compatibility tests on metrics to avoid unintended breaking changes like 
> > this in the future.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 10:35 AM Qingsheng Ren <re...@apache.org 
> > <mailto:re...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi devs and users,
> >>
> >> I’d like to start a discussion about reverting a breaking change about 
> >> sink metrics made in 1.15 by FLINK-26126 [1] and FLINK-26492 [2].
> >>
> >> TL;DR
> >>
> >> All sink metrics with name “numXXXOut” defined in FLIP-33 are replace by 
> >> “numXXXSend” in FLINK-26126 and FLINK-26492. Considering metric names are 
> >> public APIs, this is a breaking change to end users and not backward 
> >> compatible. Also unfortunately this breaking change was not discussed in 
> >> the mailing list before.
> >>
> >> Background
> >>
> >> As defined previously in FLIP-33 (the FLIP page has been changed so please 
> >> refer to the old version [3] ), metric “numRecordsOut” is used for 
> >> reporting the total number of output records since the sink started 
> >> (number of records written to the external system), and similarly for 
> >> “numRecordsOutPerSecond”, “numBytesOut”, “numBytesOutPerSecond” and 
> >> “numRecordsOutError”. Most sinks are following this naming and definition. 
> >> However, these metrics are ambiguous in the new Sink API as “numXXXOut” 
> >> could be used by the output of SinkWriterOperator for reporting number of 
> >> Committables delivered to SinkCommitterOperator. In order to resolve the 
> >> conflict, FLINK-26126 and FLINK-26492 changed names of these metrics with 
> >> “numXXXSend”.
> >>
> >> Necessity of reverting this change
> >>
> >> - Metric names are actually public API, as end users need to configure 
> >> metric collecting and alerting system with metric names. Users have to 
> >> reset all configurations related to affected metrics.
> >> - This could also affect custom and external sinks not maintained by 
> >> Flink, which might have implemented with numXXXOut metrics.
> >> - The number of records sent to external system is way more important than 
> >> the number of Committables sent to SinkCommitterOperator, as the latter 
> >> one is just an internal implementation of sink. We could have a new metric 
> >> name for the latter one instead.
> >> - We could avoid splitting the project by version (like “plz use numXXXOut 
> >> before 1.15 and use numXXXSend after”) if we revert it ASAP, cosidering 
> >> 1.16 is still not released for now.
> >>
> >> As a consequence, I’d like to hear from devs and users about your opinion 
> >> on changing these metrics back to “numXXXOut”.
> >>
> >> Looking forward to your reply!
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26126 
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26126>
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26492 
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26492>
> >> [1] FLIP-33, version 18: 
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211883136 
> >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211883136>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Qingsheng

Reply via email to