+1 for bringing this into a consistent state. Thanks, Chesnay.

nit: There's a conflict between this FLIP-254 and the FLIP-254 on the redis
streams connector.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:52 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:

> * backport to 1.14/1.15
>
> On 31/08/2022 14:45, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > @Yu I haven't really considered 1.14/1.15.
> >
> > What exactly are you interested in; a list of all breaking changes
> > between 1.15.0 and the latest 1.15.x (or intermediate releases),
> > or are you suggesting to also backport this whole thing to 1.16 (which
> > should be possible)?
> >
> > On 31/08/2022 13:31, Yu Li wrote:
> >> +1 for the FLIP. Thanks for the efforts Chesnay.
> >>
> >> I believe ensuring binary compatibility for patch releases will also
> >> benefit our end users besides the cloud service providers.
> >>
> >> I'm also wondering about the compatibility checking result after
> >> enabling
> >> japicmp for all modules with existing patch releases (1.14.x and
> >> 1.15.x).
> >> Do you already have one with your local customized japicmp or do we
> >> need to
> >> wait until the works tracked in JIRA are done? (smile)
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 18:50, Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Chesnay,
> >>>
> >>> thanks for bringing this up and for your research and fixes to japicmd.
> >>>
> >>> +1 for the proposal. For Immerok as an Apache Flink cloud service
> >>> provider
> >>> it is very valuable to know that our users don't need to upgrade
> >>> their Jobs
> >>> when the Flink patch version changes. I am sure the same is true for
> >>> internal platform teams as well as end users of Apache Flink.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Konstantin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Mi., 31. Aug. 2022 um 12:31 Uhr schrieb Chesnay Schepler <
> >>> ches...@apache.org>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just published a FLIP to guarantee binary compatibility for patch
> >>>> releases. I don't think our current guarantees of source-compatibility
> >>>> are sufficient for patch releases.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=225152857
> >>>
> >>>> Let me know what you think.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Chesnay
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> https://twitter.com/snntrable
> >>> https://github.com/knaufk
> >>>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to