Hi Mingde Peng, Thanks for creating the FLIP. I have no strong opinion on this topic, but I am curious if there are others who would like to chip-in to move this FLIP forward.
Best regards, Martijn Op wo 22 jun. 2022 om 09:24 schreef md peng <pengm...@gmail.com>: > Hi everyone, > > IterativeCondition defines a user-defined condition that decides if an > element should be accepted in the pattern or not. The condition iterates > over the previously accepted elements in the pattern and decides to accept > a new element or not based on some statistic over elements. In certain > accumulation scenarios, for example filtering goods with more than 1,000 > orders within 10 minutes, accumulation operation needs to perform in > IterativeCondition. The accumulation behaivor causes the repeated > calculation of the accumulation state, because an accumulation state may > execute multiple transitions with condition and each condition invoker will > be accumulated once. > > I would like to start a discussion about FLIP-244[1], in which > AccumulationStateCondition is proposed to define the IterativeCondition > with accumulation and filter the accumulation state with accumulator. The > accumulation state is consistent within the lifecycle of a matching NFA, on > other words, user doesn't need to pay attention to when the accumulation > state is initialized and cleaned up. > > Please take a look at the FLIP page [1] to get more details. Any feedback > about the FLIP-244 would be appreciated! > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-244%3A+Support+IterativeCondition+with+Accumulator+in+CEP+Pattern > > Best regards, > > Mingde Peng >