Hi everyone,

thank you for the feedback so far. I've checked the length of the previous
last release cycles. Up until Flink 1.14, we've actually been incredibly
good at maintaining a 5 months release cycle (see below). Interestingly,
the community is officially targeting a 4 months release cycle [1].

- 1.15.0 2022-05-01? (7 months, 2 days?)
- 1.14.0: 2021-09-29 (4 months, 26 days)
- 1.13.0: 2021-05-03 (4 months, 23 days)
- 1.12.0: 2020-12-10 (5 months, 3 days)
- 1.11.0: 2020-07-07 (4 months, 26 days)
- 1.10.0: 2020-02-11

The 1.15 release cycle has took significantly longer. In my opinion we
should try to get back into the 5 months cadence with the next release.
Since empirically we always often end up moving the the feature freeze by a
week or two, and that we often need about a month for release testing &
stabilization and releasing, I don't think, we should move the planned
feature freeze to later than
*mid August. *
What do you think:
1. Should we continue to strive for a 5 months release cycle (and update
[1] accordingly)?
2. Does it sound reasonable to target a feature freeze date, which is 1.5
months before to the desired release date?

Cheers,

Konstantin

 [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Time-based+releases

Am Do., 28. Apr. 2022 um 05:20 Uhr schrieb Jingsong Li <
jingsongl...@gmail.com>:

> Thanks Konstantin and Chesnay for starting the discussion. And thanks
> Konstantin, Chesnay, Godfrey, Martijn for volunteering.
>
> The 1.16 release at the end of July means that there are currently
> only 3 months to fully commit to 1.16 development, and I'm a little
> concerned that this is too short a time frame, which may result in
> some features only reaching a halfway decent state.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 7:10 PM David Morávek <d...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Konstantin and Chesnay for starting the discussion and
> volunteering.
> > The timeline proposal sounds reasonable :+1:
> >
> > Best,
> > D.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:37 PM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Thanks for starting this discussion. I would also volunteer to help
> out as
> > > a release manager for the 1.16 release.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Martijn Visser
> > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 at 13:19, godfrey he <godfre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Konstantin & Chesnay,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for driving this discussion, I am willing to volunteer as the
> > > > release manager for 1.16.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Godfrey
> > > >
> > > > Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> 于2022年4月26日周二 18:23写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > With Flink 1.15 about to be released, the community has started
> > > planning
> > > > &
> > > > > developing features for the next release, Flink 1.16. As such, I
> would
> > > > like
> > > > > to start a discussion around managing this release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Specifically, Chesnay & myself would like to volunteer as release
> > > > managers.
> > > > > Our focus as release managers would be
> > > > > * to propose a release timeline
> > > > > * to provide an overview of all ongoing development threads and
> ideally
> > > > > their current status to the community
> > > > > * to keep an eye on build stability
> > > > > * facilitate release testing
> > > > > * to do the actual release incl. communication (blog post, etc.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Is anyone else interested in acting as a release manager for Flink
> > > 1.16?
> > > > If
> > > > > so, we are happy to make this a joint effort.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides the question of who will act as a release manager, I
> think, we
> > > > can
> > > > > already use this thread to align on a timeline. For collecting
> features
> > > > and
> > > > > everything else, we would start a dedicated threads shortly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given Flink 1.15 will be released in the next days, and aiming for
> a 4
> > > > > months release cycle including stabilization, this would mean
> *feature
> > > > > freeze at the end of July*. The exact date could be determined
> later.
> > > Any
> > > > > thoughts on the timeline.?
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking forward to your thoughts!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Chesnay & Konstantin
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to