We could just stop releasing to apache/flink and only go for the
official-images route.
On 28/04/2022 07:43, Xintong Song wrote:
Forgot to mention that, we have also proposed to use one shared account and
limit its access to the PMC members, like what we do with the PyPI account.
Unfortunately, INFRA rejected this proposal [1].
Thank you~
Xintong Song
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23208
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:39 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to start a discussion about maintainers for DockerHub
repositories under the *apache* namespace [1].
Currently, the Flink community maintains various repositories (flink,
flink-statefun, flink-statefun-playground, and flink-kubernetes-operator)
on DockerHub under the *apache* namespace. There's a limitation on how many
members the *apache* namespace can add, and recently INFRA is complaining
about Flink taking too many places [2][3]. They would like us to reduce our
maintainers from 20 now to 5.
Jingsong and I would like to volunteer as two of the maintainers, and we
would like to learn who else wants to join us. While any committer may
serve as one of the maintainers, it's probably nice to also involve at
least one maintainer from statefun and one from kubernetes-operator.
What do you think?
Thank you~
Xintong Song
[1] https://hub.docker.com/orgs/apache
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23208
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23213
