Hi, If this is already proposed and accepted in the FLIP, then we indeed don't need a new FLIP.
Best regards, Martijn Visser https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 https://github.com/MartijnVisser On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 11:25, 刘大龙 <ld...@zju.edu.cn> wrote: > Hi，Martijn > > Thanks for the Jingsong remind. This issue is the part of FLIP [1] which > propose the related partition syntax, In our this issue, here no new added > DDL/DMLs is introduced about partitioned table, so these syntax have been > discussed and voted in community. I think we don't need a new FLIP. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-63%3A+Rework+table+partition+support > > Best, > > Ron > > > -----原始邮件----- > > 发件人: "刘大龙" <ld...@zju.edu.cn> > > 发送时间: 2022-04-15 17:15:36 (星期五) > > 收件人: dev@flink.apache.org > > 抄送: > > 主题: Re: Re: Discussion about enhancing the partitioned table syntax > > > > Hi, Jingsong > > > > Thanks for your reply, this FLIP [1] is good to me, I have not found it. > The enhanced partition syntax in FLINK-27237 is a part of FLIP [1], there > is no new added DDL/DMLs, so these syntax have been discussed and voted in > community. This issue is continue to finish the work of syntax part in FLIP > [1]. > > > > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-63%3A+Rework+table+partition+support > > > > Best, > > > > Ron > > > > > -----原始邮件----- > > > 发件人: "Jingsong Li" <jingsongl...@gmail.com> > > > 发送时间: 2022-04-15 16:02:37 (星期五) > > > 收件人: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > > 抄送: > > > 主题: Re: Discussion about enhancing the partitioned table syntax > > > > > > Thanks for taking this. > > > > > > There is a FLIP [1] to define some partition DMLs. > > > > > > If you have added DMLs, we need to vote again. (Create a new FLIP) > > > > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-63%3A+Rework+table+partition+support > > > > > > Best, > > > Jingsong > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 3:20 PM Martijn Visser < > martijnvis...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > > > > > Thanks for reaching out to the mailing list. As I mentioned in the > Jira > > > > ticket, a SQL syntax change requires a FLIP [1]. A FLIP requires a > > > > discussion and a vote, which is explained in more detail in the Flink > > > > Bylaws [2] > > > > > > > > Please create a FLIP and follow the process for this. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Martijn Visser > > > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals > > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 09:08, 刘大龙 <ld...@zju.edu.cn> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For partitioned table, there are still some related syntaxes that > are not > > > > > supported, which will be very useful for partitioned table. In > batch > > > > > analysis scenarios, such as Hive table, partitioned table is a > very common > > > > > case. Since the current Flink is mainly for streaming processing, > not much > > > > > work has been done on partitioned table. In order to enhance the > experience > > > > > of using Flink in batch job, as well as to improve the DDL syntax. > So I > > > > > created the issue FLINK-27237 to discuss about enhancing the > partition > > > > > table syntax. You are welcome to discuss on the issue and give > comments so > > > > > that this proposal can be improved. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ron >
