Hi there,

It is exciting to see the discussion of the release timeline! I agree that
the end of March is a proper date.
To make others easier get involved in this discussion, I think we may need
to provide a more straightforward feature list for the preview release. The
"Initial Feature Set" in FLIP-212
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-212:+Introduce+Flink+Kubernetes+Operator>
is
almost complete. But some new features like webhook based validate and
flink operator metric are not added and they are only tracked in the long
JIRA list. If we can update the FLIP, it may be more convenient and can
also help us write release notes later. I also created a draft
<https://github.com/bgeng777/flink-kubernetes-operator/blob/features/doc/features.md>
for myself to track completed or in-plan features. Hope it can help.

Best,
Biao Geng

Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 于2022年3月14日周一 04:11写道:

> @Konstantin: Yes I completely agree that for this release the API (CRD)
> should be marked experimental!
> I have opened a ticket to track this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26620
>
> @Yang Wang <danrtsey...@gmail.com> : I think we still have plenty of time
> to work on features like the session job before the release, would be nice
> to provide a complete story to the users.
>
> Gyula
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 5:17 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > can we mark all the APIs as experimental/alpha so that it is clear that
> > these can be broken in future releases for now? I think this would be
> very
> > important given the early stage of the project. We want to be able to
> > address shortcomings without worrying too much about backwards
> > compatibility at this stage, I believe.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Konstantin
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 7:48 AM Yang Wang <danrtsey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Gyula for starting this discussion.
> > >
> > > Given that the core functionality is closing to stable, I am in favor
> of
> > > having the MVP release at the end of March.
> > > The first release will help us to collect more feedbacks from the
> users.
> > > Also it is a good chance to let the users know that the community is
> > trying
> > > to maintain an official Kubernetes operator :)
> > > I hope that the companies could build their own production streaming
> > > platform on top of the flink-kubernetes-operator in the future.
> > >
> > > FYI: @Wenjun Min is still working hard on supporting the Session Job in
> > > Flink Kubernetes operator, It will be great if we could include it in
> the
> > > first release.
> > > And I believe we have enough time.
> > >
> > > Moreover, I agree with you that we need to invest more time in the
> > > documentation, e2e tests, helm install optimization, logging,
> > > etc. before the release.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yang
> > >
> > >
> > > Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> 于2022年3月12日周六 01:10写道:
> > >
> > > > Hi Team!
> > > >
> > > > I would like to discuss the timeline for the initial
> preview/milestone
> > > > release of the flink-kubernetes-operator
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator> project.
> > > >
> > > > The last few weeks we have been working very hard with the community
> to
> > > > stabilize the initial feature set and I think we have made great
> > > progress.
> > > > While we are still far from a production ready-state, a preview
> release
> > > > will give us the opportunity to reach more people and gather much
> > needed
> > > > input to take this project to the next level.
> > > >
> > > > There are still a couple missing features that we need to iron out
> and
> > we
> > > > need to make sure we have proper documentation but after that I think
> > it
> > > > would be a good time for the preview release.
> > > >
> > > > I propose to aim for the first release candidate around the 25-27th
> of
> > > > March after which we should dedicate a few days for some extensive
> > > testing
> > > > and bugfixing.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Gyula
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Konstantin Knauf
> >
> > https://twitter.com/snntrable
> >
> > https://github.com/knaufk
> >
>

Reply via email to