Hi David, Thanks for bringing up this question.
Regarding PyFlink, the dependent Python libraries have already supported M1 recently and so I guess we could also make it in the next release, e.g. Flink 1.16. I will follow up with it. Regards, Dian On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:27 PM Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > For the problem of RocksDB running on M1 machines, RocksDB community has > recently resolved this in RocksDB-6.29 [1], maybe we could involve this > change in next Flink-1.16. > > > [1] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9662 > > Best > Yun Tang > ________________________________ > From: David Anderson <dander...@apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 16:25 > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject: status of Apple Silicon (M1) as Flink dev platform? > > What's the current status of using the Apple Silicon (M1) platform for > Flink development? Have we reached the point where everything "just works", > or do there remain lingering annoyances (or worse)? > > In the past, I've seen reports of issues involving, e.g., RocksDB, nodejs, > protobuf, and pyflink. Looking in Jira, I see these issues haven't been > resolved yet, but I'm not sure what to read into that: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24932 (Frocksdb cannot run on > Apple M1) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25188 (Cannot install PyFlink > on MacOS with M1 chip) > > Best, > David >
