I'm ready to pick this one up, I have some code that's working locally.
Shall I create a PR?



On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 3:17 PM Igal Shilman <igal.shil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great, ping me when you would like to pick this up.
>
> For the related issue, I think that can be a good addition indeed!
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:55 PM Galen Warren <ga...@cvillewarrens.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Gotcha, thanks. I may be able to work on that one in a couple weeks if
> > you're looking for help.
> >
> > Unrelated question -- another thing that would be useful for me would be
> > the ability to set a maximum backoff interval in
> BoundedExponentialBackoff
> > or the async equivalent. My situation is this. I'd like to set a long
> > maxRequestDuration, so it takes a good while for Statefun to "give up"
> on a
> > function call, i.e. perhaps several hours or even days. During that time,
> > if the backoff interval doubles on each failure, those backoff intervals
> > get pretty long.
> >
> > Sometimes, in exponential backoff implementations, I've seen the concept
> of
> > a max backoff interval, i.e. once the backoff interval reaches that
> point,
> > it won't go any higher. So I could set it to, say, 60 seconds, and no
> > matter how long it would retry the function, the interval between retries
> > wouldn't be more than that.
> >
> > Do you think that would be a useful addition? I could post something to
> the
> > dev list if you want.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:39 PM Igal Shilman <i...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Galen,
> > > You are right, it is not possible, but there is no real reason for
> that.
> > > We should fix this, and I've created the following JIRA issue [1]
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25933
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 6:30 PM Galen Warren <ga...@cvillewarrens.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it possible to choose the async HTTP transport using
> > > > RequestReplyFunctionBuilder? It looks to me that it is not, but I
> > wanted
> > > to
> > > > double check. Thanks.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to