+1 (binding) Given [1] I consider the issue David raised resolved. Thanks David and please confirm here.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cvwknd5fhohj0wfv8mfwn70jwpjvxrjj On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:07 AM David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gabor, > > Thanks for driving this. This is headed in a right direction, but I feel > that the FLIP still might need bit more work. > > -1 (non-binding) until the discussion thread is resolved [1]. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cvwknd5fhohj0wfv8mfwn70jwpjvxrjj > > Best, > D. > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:47 AM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Gabor, > > > > +1 (binding) from me > > > > This is a great effort and significant improvement to the Kerberos > security > > story . > > > > Cheers > > Gyula > > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 15:58, Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-211 [1], which was discussed > and > > > reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72h, unless there is an objection or > > not > > > enough votes. > > > > > > BR, > > > G > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-211%3A+Kerberos+delegation+token+framework > > > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/cvwknd5fhohj0wfv8mfwn70jwpjvxrjj > > > > > >
