Hi Konstantin, Could we be more specific about what this vote is for? I'm asking because I don't think we have consensus on all you have mentioned.
To be specific, I'd be +1 for deprecating per-job mode in 1.15. However, I'm not sure about the following. - Targeting to drop it in 1.16 or 1.17. TBH, I'd expect to stay compatible on the per-job mode a bit longer. - Targeting Yarn application mode on par with the standalone / K8s. I think we need the Yarn application mode on par with the Yarn per-job mode, as the latter is being dropped and users are migrating from. - FLINK-24897 being the only blocker for dropping the per-job mode. I think a good time to drop the per-job mode is probably when we know most users have migrated to the application mode. Even if the Yarn application mode provides equivalent functionality as the Yarn per-job mode does, it's probably nicer to not force users to migrate if the per-job mode is still widely used. Discussing the above items is not my purpose here. Just trying to say that IMHO in the previous discussion [1] we have not reached consensus on all the things mentioned in this voting thread. Consequently, if these are all included in the scope of the vote, I'm afraid I cannot give my +1 on this. Sorry if I'm nitpicking. Thank you~ Xintong Song [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8g76cqgtr2c515rd1bs41vy285f317n On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:27 PM Jing Zhang <beyond1...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks Konstantin for driving this. > > Best, > Jing Zhang > > Chenya Zhang <chenyazhangche...@gmail.com> 于2022年1月29日周六 07:04写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:46 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:27 AM David Morávek <d...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > On Fri 28. 1. 2022 at 17:53, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 4:57 PM Gabor Somogyi < > > > gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > We're intended to make tests when FLINK-24897 > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24897> is fixed. > > > > > > In case of further issues we're going to create further jiras. > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > G > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 4:30 PM Konstantin Knauf < > > kna...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the discussion in [1], I would like to start a vote on > > > > > > deprecating > > > > > > > per-job mode in Flink 1.15. Consequently, we would target to > drop > > > it > > > > in > > > > > > > Flink 1.16 or Flink 1.17 latest. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only limitation that would block dropping Per-Job mode > > > mentioned > > > > in > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > is tracked in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24897. > > > In > > > > > > > general, the implementation of application mode in YARN should > be > > > on > > > > > par > > > > > > > with the standalone and Kubernetes before we drop per-job mode. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours, and will be accepted > > by a > > > > > > > consensus of active committers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8g76cqgtr2c515rd1bs41vy285f317n > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Konstantin Knauf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/snntrable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/knaufk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
