Thanks everyone. We've moved forward with removing the MapR file system in Flink 1.15.
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 10:37, Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. Thanks for driving. > > Best, > Jingsong > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:22 PM Chang Li <lichang...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. > > > > Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2022年1月5日周三 18:33写道： > > > > > +1 for dropping the MapR FS. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Till > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:11 AM Martijn Visser <mart...@ververica.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > Thanks for your input. I've checked the MapR implementation and it > has no > > > > annotation at all. Given the circumstances that we thought that MapR > was > > > > already dropped, I would propose to immediately remove MapR in Flink > 1.15 > > > > instead of first marking it as deprecated and removing it in Flink > 1.16. > > > > > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 17:27, David Morávek <d...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1, agreed with Seth's reasoning. There has been no real activity in > > > MapR > > > >> FS module for years [1], so the eventual users should be good with > using > > > >> the jars from the older Flink versions for quite some time > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/commits/master/flink-filesystems/flink-mapr-fs > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> D. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 (what Seth said) > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:15 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > +1 > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I actually thought we had already dropped this FS. If anyone is > still > > > >>> > relying on it in production, the file system abstraction in > Flink has > > > >>> been > > > >>> > incredibly stable over the years. They should be able to use the > 1.14 > > > >>> MapR > > > >>> > FS with later versions of Flink. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Seth > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 10:03 AM Martijn Visser < > > > mart...@ververica.com> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> Hi all, > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Flink supports multiple file systems [1] which includes MapR FS. > > > MapR > > > >>> as > > > >>> >> a company doesn't exist anymore since 2019, the technology and > > > >>> intellectual > > > >>> >> property has been sold to Hewlett Packard. > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> I don't think that there's anyone who's using MapR anymore and > > > >>> therefore > > > >>> >> I think it would be good to deprecate this for Flink 1.15 and > then > > > >>> remove > > > >>> >> it in Flink 1.16. Removing this from Flink will slightly shrink > the > > > >>> >> codebase and CI runtime. > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> I'm also cross posting this to the User mailing list, in case > > > there's > > > >>> >> still anyone who's using MapR. > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Best regards, > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> Martijn > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> [1] > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/deployment/filesystems/overview/ > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> > > > >>> Konstantin Knauf > > > >>> > > > >>> https://twitter.com/snntrable > > > >>> > > > >>> https://github.com/knaufk > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >
