+1 to a separate repository assuming this repository will still be part of
Apache Flink (same PMC, Committers). I am not aware we have something like
"sub-projects" officially.

I share Till and Timo's concerns regarding "store".

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:59 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for the separate project.
>
> I would agree that flink-store is not the best name. flink-storage >
> flink-store but I would even more prefer a name that conveys that it has
> something to do with table storage.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:14 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the separate project
> >
> > But maybe use `flink-storage` instead of `flink-store`?
> >
> > I'm not a native speaker but store is defined as "A place where items
> > may be purchased.". It almost sounds like the `flink-packages` project.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Timo
> >
> >
> > On 07.01.22 08:37, Jingsong Li wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote for create a separate sub project for
> > > FLIP-188 [1]: `flink-store`.
> > >
> > > - If you agree with the name `flink-store`, please just +1
> > > - If you have a better suggestion, please write your suggestion,
> > > followed by a reply that can +1 to the name that has appeared
> > > - If you do not want it to be a subproject of flink, just -1
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an
> > > objection or not enough votes.
> > >
> > > [1]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-188%3A+Introduce+Built-in+Dynamic+Table+Storage
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jingsong
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 

Konstantin Knauf

https://twitter.com/snntrable

https://github.com/knaufk

Reply via email to