+1 (binding) On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:58 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Although I still think all the set* methods should accept a Supplier > instead of a Gauge. > > On 02/08/2021 12:36, Becket Qin wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > > > Thanks for driving the efforts, Arvid. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:55 AM Arvid Heise <ar...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Dear devs, > >>> > >>> I'd like to open a vote on FLIP-179: Expose Standardized Operator > Metrics > >>> [1] which was discussed in this thread [2]. > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > objection > >>> or not enough votes. > >>> > >>> The proposal excludes the implementation for the > currentFetchEventTimeLag > >>> metric, which caused a bit of discussion without a clear convergence. > We > >>> will implement that metric in a generic way at a later point and > >> encourage > >>> sources to implement it themselves in the meantime. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> Arvid > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-179%3A+Expose+Standardized+Operator+Metrics > >>> [2] > >>> > >>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r856920cbfe6a262b521109c5bdb9e904e00a9b3f1825901759c24d85%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >
