BIG +1 for this. Thanks Stephan for starting this discussion. Too many warnings in IDE and mvn build are frustrating. We can have the opportunity to avoid the degradation of code quality.
Best, Jingsong On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 3:26 PM David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know that sonar can report back by adding a comment to the issue (very > similar way the FlinkBot does) and can block the merge (probably using > check runs api [1]), if some quality gate fails. I was never setting it up, > so I'd need to take a closer look. This is a feature set we were using on > GH in the past. > > [1] https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/checks#runs > > D. > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 8:49 AM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Maybe we could leverage sonar cloud infrastructure for this. They > already > > > have built in rules for deprecation warnings [1]. Also they have a free > > > offering for public open-source repositories [2]. > > > > > > > Cool, I didn't know this. There are already quite a lot of Apache > Projects > > there: https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/apache/projects, and INFRA > > seems > > to be very open to adding more projects: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19555 > > > > Do you know if GH PR integration is also available? (so that it shows a > > warning in the PR if inspections on the change trigger) > > > -- Best, Jingsong Lee
