Thank everyone for participating in this discussion! The improvement has been accepted now. Can someone kindly assign this ticket FLINK-22452 [1] to me? I would like to start to implement this feature.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22452 Thanks, Wenhao On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 6:32 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sounds good from my side, please go ahead. > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:31 PM Wenhao Ji <predator....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Stephan and Piotr for your replies. It seems that there is no >> problem or concern about this feature. If there is no further >> objection, I will start a vote thread for FLIP-172. >> >> Thanks, >> Wenhao >> >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:41 PM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > +1 from my side on this idea. I do not see any problems that could be >> > caused by this change. >> > >> > Best, >> > Piotrek >> > >> > śr., 23 cze 2021 o 08:59 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> napisał(a): >> > >> > > The motivation and the proposal sound good to me, +1 from my side. >> > > >> > > Would be good to have a quick opinion from someone who worked >> > > specifically >> > > with Kafka, maybe Becket or Piotr? >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > Stephan >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 9:50 AM Wenhao Ji <predator....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi everyone, >> > >> >> > >> I would like to open this discussion thread to take about the FLIP-172 >> > >> < >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-172%3A+Support+custom+transactional.id+prefix+in+FlinkKafkaProducer >> > >> >, >> > >> which aims to provide a way to support specifying a custom >> > >> transactional.id >> > >> in the FlinkKafkaProducer class. >> > >> >> > >> I am looking forwards to your feedback and suggestions! >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Wenhao >> > >> >> > >
