* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22686: This is marked as Blocker, but there is no one assigned yet. Piotr/Arvid: I wouldn't make this a blocker for this bug fix as it only affects unaligned checkpoints in combination with broadcast state. What do you think? Can you already give an estimated time to resolution?
I forgot to assign myself. I am actually working on it and I am positive we can fix it this week. If anyone would like to help preparing the RC I am happy to help with the steps that require PMC permissions. If no one volunteers until Monday I can also do it myself. However I'd appreciate if someone else could take care of tracking the progress of the issues we want to include in the release. Best, Dawid On 20/05/2021 09:59, Konstantin Knauf wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Let's see where we stand towards releasing Flink 1.13.1. I am aware of one > additional license-related blocker that popped up: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22706. Overall: > > Done or close to done: > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22666: Done > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22494: Done > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22688: Matthias/Chesnay: PR > available. > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22706 > > Unclear: > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22686: This is marked as > Blocker, but there is no one assigned yet. Piotr/Arvid: I wouldn't make > this a blocker for this bug fix as it only affects unaligned checkpoints in > combination with broadcast state. What do you think? Can you already give > an estimated time to resolution? > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22266: Assigned to Robert. No > PR yet. > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22646: Chesnay/David: Closed > as "Won't fix", but the PR discussion is not fully concluded. > > Is there anything else? > > Overall, I would propose to wait until Friday for fixes to come in and > create a release candidate early on Monday next week. I think we've already > accumulated quite a few fixes that justify a patch release. Of course, it'd > be nice if more fixes make it in, in particular FLINK-22686 would be nice > to have so that we don't need a quick follow up patch release soon. > > Does any PMC member have time to manage the actual release early next week? > > Cheers, > > Konstantin > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:17 PM David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Konstantin, >> >> Would it be possible to add FLINK-22646 [1] into the release? This is a >> regression, that we need to workaround in order to support 1.13.x in Apache >> Beam [2]. >> >> Best, >> D. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22646 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14719 >> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 1:16 PM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for initiating this discussion, Konstantin. FLINK-22494 [1] (Avoid >>> discarding checkpoints in case of failure) is reviewed and backported. I >>> have FLINK-22688 [2] (exception history not working properly for >> unassigned >>> tasks) that came up recently. I provided a fix for it [3] already and >> hope >>> to get it reviewed soon. >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22494 >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22688 >>> [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15945 >>> >>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:13 PM Arvid Heise <ar...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd also like to have a fix for >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22686 that was reported >>> today. >>>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:52 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Konstantin, >>>>> >>>>> thanks for starting the discussion. From the Table API side, we also >>>>> fixed a couple of critical issues already that justify releasing a >>>>> 1.13.1 asap. >>>>> >>>>> Personally, I would like to include >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22666 that fixes some >> last >>>>> issues with the Scala Table API to DataStream conversion. It should >> be >>>>> fixed today or tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise +1. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Timo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17.05.21 10:11, Robert Metzger wrote: >>>>>> Thanks a lot for starting the discussion about the release. >>>>>> I'd like to include >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22266 >>>> as >>>>>> well (I forgot to set the fixVersion accordingly). It's an >> important >>>> fix >>>>>> for the stop with savepoint operation of the adaptive scheduler. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:03 AM Konstantin Knauf < >> kna...@apache.org >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to start discussing Flink 1.13.1. There are already >>>> quite a >>>>>>> few critical fixes merged, specifically: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22555 (LGPL-2.1 >> files >>>> in >>>>>>> flink-python jars) >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17170 (Cannot stop >>>>> streaming >>>>>>> job with savepoint which uses kinesis consumer) >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22574 (Adaptive >>>>> Scheduler: >>>>>>> Can not cancel restarting job) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The following two tickets are in progress: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22502 >>>>>>> (DefaultCompletedCheckpointStore >>>>>>> drops unrecoverable checkpoints silently) >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22494 (Avoid >>> discarding >>>>>>> checkpoints in case of failure) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias, Roman: could you give an update on those? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are there any other open tickets that we should wait for? Is >> there a >>>> PMC >>>>>>> member who would like to manage the release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Konstantin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/snntrable >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/knaufk >>>>>>> >>>>> >
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
