+1 (binding) Best, Kurt
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:43 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Timo > > On 03.03.21 04:14, Jark Wu wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Jark > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-162 [1], which has been > discussed > >> and > >> reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. > >> > >> Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. > >> > >> The vote will be open until March 5th (72h), unless there is an > objection > >> or not enough votes. > >> > >> Best, > >> Leonard > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-162%3A+Consistent+Flink+SQL+time+function+behavior > >> < > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-162:+Consistent+Flink+SQL+time+function+behavior > >>> > >> [2] > >> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-162-Consistent-Flink-SQL-time-function-behavior-tc48116.html > >> < > >> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-162-Consistent-Flink-SQL-time-function-behavior-tc48116.html > >>> > > > >
