@Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If FLIP-160 is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote and rewrite FLIP-159. But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding FLIP-160 so far.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM. > > +1 > > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion. > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first? > > Best, > Yangze Guo > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Robert. LGTM. > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP. > > > > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote > will be > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd. > > > > > > Best, > > > Robert > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > [2] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode > > > >
