Hi Aljoscha,
I think so since we seems to do not have other divergence and new
objections now. I'll open the vote then. Very thanks!
Best,
Yun
------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
Send Time:2021 Jan. 15 (Fri.) 21:24
To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-147: Support Checkpoints After Tasks Finished
Thanks for the summary! I think we can now move towards a [VOTE] thread,
right?
On 2021/01/15 13:43, Yun Gao wrote:
>1) For the problem that the "new" root task coincidently finished
>before getting triggered successfully, we have listed two options in
>the FLIP-147[1], for the first version, now we are not tend to go with
>the first option that JM would re-compute and re-trigger new sources
>when it realized some tasks are not triggered successfully. This option
>would avoid the complexity of adding new PRC and duplicating task
>states, and in average case it would not cause too much overhead.
You wrote "we are *not* tend to go with the first option", but I think
you meant wo write "we tend to *now* go with the first option", right?
That's also how it is in the FLIP, I just wanted to clarify for the
mailing list.
