+1

Very good proposal, blink planner has been the default planner since Flink 
1.11.0, and many new features are not supported in legacy planner.  

Best,
Leonard

> 在 2020年12月9日,05:15,Arvid Heise <ar...@ververica.com> 写道:
> 
> +1, add a small info box about legacy planner and point to 1.11 doc
> (nothing should have changed)
> 
> Ideally, "legacy" and "blink" does not appear anywhere in the doc (except
> for that info box)
> 
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:35 PM Marta Paes Moreira <ma...@ververica.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1, this is confusing (esp. for new users) and also creates more and more
>> "annotation clutter" as new features are added.
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:30 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Yes, please!
>>> 
>>> On 08.12.20 16:52, David Anderson wrote:
>>>> I agree -- I think separating out the legacy planner info should make
>>>> things clearer for everyone, and then some day we can simply drop it.
>>> Plus,
>>>> doing it now will make it easier to make improvements to the docs going
>>>> forward.
>>>> 
>>>> David
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Seth,
>>>>> 
>>>>> this is a very good idea. We might not be able to remove the legacy
>>>>> planner immediately but at least we can make the docs easier for
>> current
>>>>> and future users of the Blink planner.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Making the SQL docs Blink-only with a dedicated legacy planner page
>>>>> sounds good to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Timo
>>>>> On 08.12.20 16:36, Seth Wiesman wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've been spending a lot of time recently working on the SQL
>>>>> documentation
>>>>>> and I'm finding it very difficult to explain semantics as the two
>> table
>>>>>> planners continue to diverge. As Blink has been the default planner
>> for
>>>>>> some time, and 1.12 now offers bounded data stream support, how does
>>> the
>>>>>> community feel about making the documentation "blink only"?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We would update the documentation to assume users are always using
>> the
>>>>>> Blink planner. As the legacy planner still exists we would create a
>>>>>> dedicated legacy planner page for users that have not migrated for
>>>>> whatever
>>>>>> reason - likely dataset interop. On this page, we would clearly list
>>> the
>>>>>> features that are not supported by the legacy planner and any
>> semantics
>>>>>> that differ from the Blink planner.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Seth
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Arvid Heise | Senior Java Developer
> 
> <https://www.ververica.com/>
> 
> Follow us @VervericaData
> 
> --
> 
> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> Conference
> 
> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> 
> --
> 
> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> 
> --
> Ververica GmbH
> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
> (Toni) Cheng

Reply via email to