@Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> Are there already plans or ongoing efforts for backporting the list of FLIP-27 changes that you posted?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:08 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just to provide some updates concerning the status on the > test instabilities. > > Currently, we have 30 unresolved tickets labeled with `Affects Version` > 1.11.x. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775?filter=12348580&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2%2C%201.11.3)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC > > Among the 30 tickets, 11 of them are: > - Have occured in the recent 3 months > - Not confirmed to be pure testability issues > - Not confirmed to be rare condition cases > > It would be nice if someone familiar with these components can take a look > into these issues. > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17159 (ES6) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17912 (Kafka) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17949 (Kafka) > ⁃ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18444 (Kafka) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18634 (Kafka) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18648 (Kafka) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18807 (Kafka) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19369 (BlobClientTest) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19436 (TPCDS) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19690 (Format/Parquet) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775 > (SystemProcessingTimeServiceTest) > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x. > > > > If possible, that would be great. Many people are looking forward to the > > FLIP-27 interface, but they don't want to take the risk to upgrade to > 1.12 > > (And wait 1.12). After all, 1.11 is a relatively stable version. > > > > Best, > > Jingsong > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:24 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for starting this. > > > > > > +1 form my side to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x. > > > > > > There were quite a few changes, and I think we need to cherry-pick them > > all > > > to not get some inconsistent mix of changes and many merge conflicts. > > > I made a list below of what we need to add to "release-1.11". > > > > > > *#### Core Source API Changes to backport (in REVERSE order)* > > > > > > (Use: "git log > > > flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/connector/source") > > > > > > commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e > > > [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between Source API and > > Split > > > Reader API > > > > > > commit 428fbbad85379f71a9fbf1a1ab3e3dcfa9006436 > > > [FLINK-19205][core] Add access to configuration and hostname in the > > > SourceReaderContext > > > > > > commit 723e1790744ddc78d19c7c978442af1383f38d33 > > > [hotfix][core] Add to Source Enumerator convenience methods to assign > > > single split > > > > > > *#### Connector Base Changes to Backport (in REVERSE order)* > > > > > > (Use: "git log flink-connectors/flink-connector-base") > > > > > > commit 401f56fe9d6b0271260edf9787cdcbfe4d03874d > > > [FLINK-19427][FLINK-19489][tests] Fix test conditions for > > > 'SplitFetcherTest.testNotifiesWhenGoingIdleConcurrent()' > > > > > > commit 68c5c2ff779d82a1ff81ffaf60d8a1b283797db1 > > > [FLINK-19448][connector base] Explicitly check for un-expected > condition > > > that would leave an inconsistent state > > > > > > commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e > > > [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between Source API and > > Split > > > Reader API > > > > > > commit c1ca7a4c7c21ec8868c14cdddd43c559625b794c > > > [refactor][tests] Move some source test utils from flink-connector-base > > to > > > flink-core > > > > > > commit ee5c4c211c35c70d28252363bbc8400453609977 > > > [FLINK-19251][connectors] Avoid confusing queue handling in > > > "SplitReader.handleSplitsChanges()" > > > > > > commit 5abef56b2bf85bcac786f6b16b6899b6cced7176 > > > [FLINK-19250][connectors] Fix error propagation in connector base > > > (SplitFetcherManager). > > > > > > commit 8fcca837c55a9216595ee4c03038b52747098dbb > > > [hotfix][connectors] Improve JavaDocs for SingleThreadFetcherManager > > > > > > commit 4700bb5dde3303cbe98882f6beb7379425717b01 > > > [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements to > SourceReaderBase > > > (part 2) > > > > > > commit 12261c6b7ed6478a9b9f6a69cb58246b83cab9b7 > > > [FLINK-17393][connectors] (follow-up) Wakeup the SplitFetchers more > > > elegantly. > > > > > > commit c60aaff0249bfd6b5871b7f82e03efc487a54d6b > > > [hotfix][tests] Extend test coverage for FutureCompletingBlockingQueue > > > > > > commit cef8a587d7fd2fe64cc644da5ed095d82e46f631 > > > [FLINK-19245][connectors] Set default capacity for > > > FutureCompletingBlockingQueue. > > > > > > commit 4ea95782b4c6a2538153d4d16ad3f4839c7de0fb > > > [FLINK-19223][connectors] Simplify Availability Future Model in Base > > > Connector > > > > > > commit 511857049ba30c8ff0ee56da551fa4a479dc583e > > > [FLINK-18128][connectors] Ensure idle split fetchers lead to > availability > > > notifications. > > > > > > commit a8206467af0830dcb89623ea068b5ca3b3450c92 > > > [refactor][core] Eagerly initialize the FetchTask to support proper > unit > > > testing > > > > > > commit 3b2f54bcb437f98e6137c904045cc51072b5c06b > > > [hotfix][tests] Move constants in SplitFetcherTest relevant to only one > > > test into test method > > > > > > commit d7625760a75a508bf05bcddc380bb4d62ee1743e > > > [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements to > SourceReaderBase > > > > > > commit a5b0d3297748c1be47ad579a88f24df2255a8df1 > > > [FLINK-17393][connectors] Wakeup the SplitFetchers more elegantly. > > > > > > commit f42a3ebc3e81a034b7221a803c153636fef34903 > > > [FLINK-18680][connectors] Make connector base RecordsWithSplitIds more > > > lightweight. > > > > > > commit e3d273de822b085183d09b275a445879ff94b350 > > > [FLINK-19162][connectors] Add 'recycle()' to the RecordsWithSplitIds to > > > support reuse of heavy objects. > > > > > > commit 8ebc464c2520453a70001cd712abc8dee6ee89e0 > > > [hotfix][testing] Add a set of parameterizable testing mocks for the > > Split > > > Reader API > > > > > > commit 930a07438be1185388d7150640f294dfe2a5d378 > > > [hotfix][connectors] Add RequestSplitEvent to 'flink-connector-base' > > > > > > commit e945ce8a933bc378844782f784ca473c767ca159 > > > [refactor][connectors] Backport of the connector-base exception > handling > > > from the Kafka Connector Pull Request > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:49 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > I would love to see this FLIP-27 source interface improvement [1] > made > > to > > > > 1.11.3. > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19698 > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:32 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > tzuli...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the replies so far! > > > > > > > > > > Just to provide a brief update on the status of blockers for 1.11.3 > > so > > > > far: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *PR opened, pending reviewer*- [FLINK-19717] > > SourceReaderBase.pollNext > > > > may > > > > > return END_OF_INPUT if SplitReader.fetch throws ( > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776) > > > > > > > > > > *PR opened, reviewed + close to being merged* > > > > > - [FLINK-19741] Timer service should skip restoring from raw keyed > > > stream > > > > > if it isn't the writer (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13761 > ) > > > > > - [FLINK-19748] Raw keyed stream key group iterator should be > > skipping > > > > > unwritten key groups (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13772) > > > > > > > > > > *Merged* > > > > > - [FLINK-19154] Application mode deletes HA data in case of > suspended > > > > > ZooKeeper connection > > > > > - [FLINK-19569] Upgrade ICU4J to 67.1+ > > > > > > > > > > Right now as it seems, progress is mainly blocked on a reviewer for > > > > > FLINK-19717. > > > > > Meanwhile, Xintong is keeping an eye on test instabilities [1] to > see > > > if > > > > > there are any fixes that should be applied to `release-1.11`. > > > > > > > > > > This is also a reminder, that if there are other blockers that we > > need > > > to > > > > > be aware of, or a need to re-establish estimated time for getting > > fixes > > > > in > > > > > and delay the RC for 1.11.3, please do let us know! > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Gordon > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:43 PM Kostas Kloudas < > kklou...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3 as it contains a number of > important > > > > > > fixes and thanks Gordon and Xintong for volunteering. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Kostas > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:37 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3, and thanks Gordon and Xintong > for > > > > > > > volunteering as our release managers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 09:45, Xintong Song < > > tonysong...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Gordan for starting this discussion. > > > > > > > > My pleasure to help with the release process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:29 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion Gordon. There are over > > 100 > > > > > issues > > > > > > > > > which are fixed for 1.11.3. Hence +1 for a soonish 1.11.3 > > > > release. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > for volunteering as our release managers Gordon and > Xintong! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to start a discussion for > releasing > > > > Flink > > > > > > > > 1.11.3 > > > > > > > > >> soon. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> It seems like we already have a few pressing issues that > > needs > > > > to > > > > > be > > > > > > > > >> included in a new hotfix release: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> - Heap-based timers’ restore behaviour is causing a > > > critical > > > > > > recovery > > > > > > > > >> issue for StateFun [1] [2] [3]. > > > > > > > > >> - There are several robustness issues for the FLIP-27 > new > > > > > source > > > > > > API, > > > > > > > > >> such as [4]. We already have some users using the > FLIP-27 > > > API > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > >> 1.11.x, > > > > > > > > >> so it would be important to get those fixes in for > 1.11.x > > > as > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Apart from the issues that are already marked as blocker > for > > > > > 1.11.3 > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > >> JIRA [5], please let us know in this thread if there is > > > already > > > > > > ongoing > > > > > > > > >> work for other important fixes that we should try to > > include. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to volunteer for managing this > > > release, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > >> try to communicate the priority of pending blockers over > the > > > > next > > > > > > few > > > > > > > > >> days. > > > > > > > > >> Since the aforementioned issues are quite critical, we’d > > like > > > to > > > > > aim > > > > > > > > >> for a *feature > > > > > > > > >> freeze by the end of next week (Oct. 30th)* and start the > > > > release > > > > > > voting > > > > > > > > >> process the week after. > > > > > > > > >> If that is too short of a notice and you might need more > > time, > > > > > > please > > > > > > > > let > > > > > > > > >> us know! > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > > > > > >> Gordon > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19692 > > > > > > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19741 > > > > > > > > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19748 > > > > > > > > >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19717 > > > > > > > > >> [5] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.11.3 > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best, Jingsong Lee > > >
