+1 (non-binding).

Some of our users have asked for this tradeoff of consistency over
availability for some cases.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:02 PM Zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Thanks for driving this effort, Yuan.
>
> +1 (binding) on my side.
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org>
> Send Time:2020年10月19日(星期一) 21:02
> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-135: Approximate Task-Local Recovery
>
> Hey,
>
> I carry over my +1 (binding) from the discussion thread.
>
> Best,
> Piotrek
>
> pon., 19 paź 2020 o 14:56 Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > I would like to start a voting thread for FLIP-135 [1], for approximate
> > task local recovery. The proposal has been discussed in [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open till Oct. 23rd (72h, excluding weekends) unless
> there
> > is an objection or not enough votes.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-135+Approximate+Task-Local+Recovery
> > [2]
> >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-135-Approximate-Task-Local-Recovery-tp43930.html
> >
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Yuan
> >
>
>

Reply via email to