Thanks for pointing it out! @Yun Tang <myas...@live.com>
The specific release notes of FLINK-18242 was missing.
I have just added the notes for it in the pull request of release notes
page
(https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/366), as well as the other
missing
release notes of FLINK-17800.

Thanks,
Zhu Zhu

Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2020年8月20日周四 下午7:25写道:

> I checked to build from source code and run example on YARN and they all
> behave as expected.
> However, I think we should tell user explicitly for the interface changes
> to fix FLINK-18242 and already leave comments for the flink-web PR.
>
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
>
> ________________________________
> From: Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 21:11
> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.10.2, release candidate #2
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - checksum & signatures, OK
> - build from source, OK
> - ran some example jobs on clusters, OK
> - all pom files point to 1.10.2
> - NOTICE/LICENSE files seem OK
>
> Best,
> Congxian
>
>
> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2020年8月18日周二 下午5:24写道:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - verified checksums and signatures
> > - verified that dependency changes are reflected in NOTICE/LICENSE files
> > - built Flink with Scala 2.12 support from sources
> > - Started cluster and ran example jobs, no suspicious log output
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:21 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Verified it on Zeppelin, it works well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> 于2020年8月17日周一 下午9:41写道:
> > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for creating another release candidate!
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > - checked diff:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.10.1...release-1.10.2-rc2
> > > >   - kubernetes client was upgraded from 4.5.2 to 4.9.2 + some shading
> > > > changes ----> verified NOTICE file with shade output
> > > > - source compiles
> > > > - source sha is correct
> > > > - checked staging repository: versions set correctly, contents seem
> in
> > > line
> > > > with the changes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 1:56 PM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> > > > 1.10.2,
> > > > > as follows:
> > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> releases
> > to
> > > > be
> > > > > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> with
> > > > > fingerprint C63E230EFFF519A5BBF2C9AE6767487CD505859C [3],
> > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > > > > * source code tag "release-1.10.2-rc2" [5],
> > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > announcement
> > > > blog
> > > > > post [6].
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Zhu Zhu
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12347791
> > > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.10.2-rc2/
> > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > [4]
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1395/
> > > > > [5]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/68bb8b612932e479ca03c7ae7c0080818d89c8a1
> > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/366
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > Jeff Zhang
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to