Hi all,

When going through the status of existing FLIPs[1], I found that the status of 
quite a few of FLIPs are out of date.

1) For the FLIPs which I'm pretty sure that are already finished(the umbrella 
JIRA has been resolved), I have updated the status of them by moving them from 
"Adopted/Accepted but unreleased FLIPs" to "Implemented and Released FLIPs":

- FLIP-52: Remove legacy Program interface.
- FLIP-57: Rework FunctionCatalog
- FLIP-63: Rework table partition support
- FLIP-68: Extend Core Table System with Pluggable Modules
- FLIP-73: Introducing Executors for job submission
- FLIP-81: Executor-related new ConfigOptions.
- FLIP-84: Improve & Refactor API of TableEnvironment
- FLIP-85: Flink Application Mode
- FLIP-86: Improve Connector Properties
- FLIP 87: Primary key constraints in Table API
- FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
- FLIP-103: Better TM/JM Log Display
- FLIP-123: DDL and DML compatibility for Hive connector
- FLIP-124: Add open/close and Collector to (De)SerializationSchema


2) For the following FLIPs, it seems that the work has already been finished. 
However, as the umbrella JIRA is still open and so I'm leaving the status of 
them as it is:

- FLIP-55: Introduction of a Table API Java Expression DSL
- FLIP-93: JDBC catalog and Postgres catalog
- FLIP-110: Support LIKE clause in CREATE TABLE


3) For the following FLIPs, there are still some open subtasks. However, it 
seems that the main work has already been finished and so I guess(not quite 
sure) maybe we should also move them to "Implemented and Released FLIPs":

- FLIP-43: State Processing API
- FLIP-66: Support time attribute in SQL DDL
- FLIP-69: Flink SQL DDL Enhancement
- FLIP-79: Flink Function DDL Support

For the FLIPs under 2) and 3), it would be great if the people who are familiar 
with them could double check that whether we should update the status of them.

Thanks,
Dian

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals 
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals>

Reply via email to