I just reached out to the users@maven mailing list again to check if
there's any resolution for shading behavior post 3.2.5 [1]


[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b2dcf462de814d06d8e30bafce2c886217c5790a3ee07d33d0b8dfc%40%3Cusers.maven.apache.org%3E

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:08 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:

> You don't necessarily need to use maven 3.2.5, you just have to know
> what to watch out for.
> For that reason we are _not_ forcing maven 3.2.5 in general, but for
> releases only to be on the safe side.
>
> Some time ago Gradle was brought up as a potential replacement for
> maven, and I'd like to see that discussion concluded before making other
> major changes to the maven development process.
>
> Overall I'm sympathetic to the idea, but not really sold.
> If we switch to gradle we obviously don't need it (duh);
> if we stick with maven we will have to find a solution for the 3.2.5
> limitation eventually, and I'd much rather solve this problem than keep
> working around the limitation.
>
> On 03/06/2020 15:48, tison wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Flink forces a fixed version(3.2.5) of Maven while higher version suffers
> > from shade issues and
> > so on.
> >
> > Since different projects have different requirement of Maven. It seems a
> > good idea we add a
> > maven wrapper[1] in our repository which reduces our developers burden.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper
> >
>
>

Reply via email to