+1 to have a 1.10.1 RC soon. It has been a long time since 1.10.0 is
released.
Best,
Jark

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 16:10, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Great to see that will have the first RC for Flink 1.10.1 soon. Thanks a
> lot for driving this effort Yu!
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 5:03 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Weike and all others for the efforts!
> >
> > Here comes the latest status, we are in good shape and plan to produce
> RC1
> > next week.
> >
> > * Blockers (1 left)
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when submitting batch
> job
> > (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on
> repeated
> > job submission
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest ClassNotFoundException
> when
> > use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace to
> > minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16705 LocalExecutor tears down MiniCluster before
> client
> > can retrieve JobResult
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16913 ReadableConfigToConfigurationAdapter#getEnum
> > throws UnsupportedOperationException
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16626 Exception encountered when cancelling a job in
> > yarn per-job mode
> >   - [Fix for 1.10.1 is Done] FLINK-17093 Python UDF doesn't work when the
> > input column is of composite type
> >   - [PR reviewed] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with memory
> > state backends
> >
> > * Critical (1 left)
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate results
> > with state clean up
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract correct unique key
> > for UpsertStreamTableSink
> >   - [Fix for 1.10.1 is Done] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory should
> be
> > handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> >   - [Closed] FLINK-14316 stuck in "Job leader ... lost leadership" error
> >   - [May Postpone] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to lifetime
> of a
> > slot
> >
> > Please let me know if any concerns/comments. Thanks.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 21:35, DONG, Weike <kyled...@connect.hku.hk>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Yu,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your updates. I am still working on the fix for FLINK-16626
> > and
> > > it is expected to be completed by this Sunday after thorough testing.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Weike
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 8:43 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Updates for 1.10.1 watched issues (we are in good progress and almost
> > >> there
> > >> to produce the first RC, thanks all for the efforts):
> > >>
> > >> * Blockers (3 left)
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when submitting batch
> > job
> > >> (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on
> > >> repeated
> > >> job submission
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest ClassNotFoundException
> > when
> > >> use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace to
> > >> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> > >>   - [PR reviewed] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> memory
> > >> state backends
> > >>   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16626 Exception encountered when
> > cancelling a
> > >> job in yarn per-job mode
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16705 LocalExecutor tears down MiniCluster before
> > >> client
> > >> can retrieve JobResult
> > >>   - [PR reviewed] FLINK-16913
> > ReadableConfigToConfigurationAdapter#getEnum
> > >> throws UnsupportedOperationException
> > >>
> > >> * Critical (1 left)
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-14316 stuck in "Job leader ... lost leadership"
> error
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> results
> > >> with state clean up
> > >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract correct unique
> > key
> > >> for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>   - [Fix for 1.10.1 is Done] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory
> should
> > be
> > >> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >>   - [May Postpone] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to lifetime
> > of
> > >> a
> > >> slot
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if you find any missing ones, thanks.
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Yu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 21:06, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Here comes the latest status of issues in 1.10.1 watch list:
> > >> >
> > >> > * Blockers (4 left)
> > >> >   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when
> > >> submitting
> > >> > batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on
> > >> > repeated job submission
> > >> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> ClassNotFoundException
> > >> when
> > >> > use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >> >   - [PR Approved] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >> > FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace to
> > >> > minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> > >> >   - [In Progress] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> > memory
> > >> > state backends
> > >> >   - [New] [PR Submitted] FLINK-16705 LocalExecutor tears down
> > >> MiniCluster
> > >> > before client can retrieve JobResult
> > >> >
> > >> > * Critical (2 left)
> > >> >   - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> > results
> > >> > with state clean up
> > >> >   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract correct
> > >> > unique key for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >> >   - [Fix for 1.10.1 Done] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory should
> > be
> > >> > handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >> >   - [Open] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to lifetime of a
> > slot
> > >> >
> > >> > There's a new blocker added. Please let me know if you find any
> other
> > >> > issues should be put into the watch list. Thanks.
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > Yu
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 14:37, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi All,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Here is the status update of issues in 1.10.1 watch list:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * Blockers (7)
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when
> > >> >> submitting batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM
> > >> error
> > >> >> on repeated job submission
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >> >> ClassNotFoundException when use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >> >> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace
> to
> > >> >> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Open] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with memory
> > state
> > >> >> backends
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * Critical (4)
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> > results
> > >> >> with state clean up
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract
> correct
> > >> >> unique key for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory should
> be
> > >> >> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - [Open] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to lifetime of a
> > >> slot
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Please let me know if you see any new blockers to add to the list.
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Best Regards,
> > >> >> Yu
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 00:11, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Thanks for the updates Till!
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> For FLINK-16018, maybe we could create two sub-tasks for easy and
> > >> >>> complete fix separately, and only include the easy one in 1.10.1?
> Or
> > >> please
> > >> >>> just feel free to postpone the whole task to 1.10.2 if "all or
> > >> nothing"
> > >> >>> policy is preferred (smile). Thanks.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>> Yu
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 23:33, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org
> >
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> +1 for a soonish bug fix release. Thanks for volunteering as our
> > >> release
> > >> >>>> manager Yu.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I think we can soon merge the increase of metaspace size and
> > >> improving
> > >> >>>> the
> > >> >>>> error message. The assumption is that we currently don't have too
> > >> many
> > >> >>>> small Flink 1.10 deployments with a process size <= 1GB. Of
> course,
> > >> the
> > >> >>>> sooner we release the bug fix release, the fewer deployments will
> > be
> > >> >>>> affected by this change.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> For FLINK-16018, I think there would be an easy solution which we
> > >> could
> > >> >>>> include in the bug fix release. The proper fix will most likely
> > take
> > >> a
> > >> >>>> bit
> > >> >>>> longer, though.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Cheers,
> > >> >>>> Till
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrey Zagrebin <
> > >> azagre...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > @Andrey and @Xintong - could we have a quick poll on the user
> > >> >>>> mailing
> > >> >>>> > list
> > >> >>>> > > about increasing the metaspace size in Flink 1.10.1?
> > Specifically
> > >> >>>> asking
> > >> >>>> > > for who has very small TM setups?
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > There has been a survey about this topic since 10 days:
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > `[Survey] Default size for the new JVM Metaspace limit in 1.10`
> > >> >>>> > I can ask there about the small TM setups.
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 5:19 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > > Another blocker for 1.10.1: FLINK-16576 State inconsistency
> on
> > >> >>>> restore
> > >> >>>> > with
> > >> >>>> > > memory state backends
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > Let me recompile the watching list with recent feedbacks.
> > >> There're
> > >> >>>> > totally
> > >> >>>> > > 45 issues with Blocker/Critical priority for 1.10.1, out of
> > >> which 14
> > >> >>>> > > already resolved and 31 left, and the below ones are watched
> > >> >>>> (meaning
> > >> >>>> > that
> > >> >>>> > > once the below ones got fixed, we will kick of the releasing
> > with
> > >> >>>> left
> > >> >>>> > ones
> > >> >>>> > > postponed to 1.10.2 unless objections):
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > * Blockers (7)
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting
> when
> > >> >>>> > submitting
> > >> >>>> > > batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes
> Metaspace
> > >> OOM
> > >> >>>> error
> > >> >>>> > > on repeated job submission
> > >> >>>> > >   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >> >>>> > ClassNotFoundException
> > >> >>>> > > when use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >> >>>> > >   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >> >>>> > > FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM
> > >> Metaspace to
> > >> >>>> > > minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Open] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE
> > files
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Open] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> > memory
> > >> >>>> state
> > >> >>>> > > backends
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > * Critical (4)
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Open] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> > >> >>>> results
> > >> >>>> > with
> > >> >>>> > > state clean up
> > >> >>>> > >   - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract
> > >> correct
> > >> >>>> > unique
> > >> >>>> > > key for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory
> > >> should be
> > >> >>>> > > handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >> >>>> > >   - [Open] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to
> lifetime
> > >> of a
> > >> >>>> slot
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > Please raise your hand if you find any other issues should be
> > put
> > >> >>>> into
> > >> >>>> > this
> > >> >>>> > > list, thanks.
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > Please also note that 1.10.2 version is already created
> (thanks
> > >> for
> > >> >>>> the
> > >> >>>> > > help @jincheng), and feel free to adjust/assign fix version
> to
> > it
> > >> >>>> when
> > >> >>>> > > necessary.
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > Yu
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 18:21, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org
> >
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > > @Andrey and @Xintong - could we have a quick poll on the
> user
> > >> >>>> mailing
> > >> >>>> > > list
> > >> >>>> > > > about increasing the metaspace size in Flink 1.10.1?
> > >> Specifically
> > >> >>>> > asking
> > >> >>>> > > > for who has very small TM setups?
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:23 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > Thanks for the reminder Stephan and the inputs/discussion
> > >> >>>> Andrey and
> > >> >>>> > > > > Xintong. I totally agree that we should try best not to
> > >> >>>> introduce new
> > >> >>>> > > > > issues when resolving the existing one. Will watch
> closely
> > >> >>>> about the
> > >> >>>> > > > > discussion and conclusion around metaspace configuration.
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > From the point as a developer instead of RM, I'm
> optimistic
> > >> that
> > >> >>>> > > > reserving
> > >> >>>> > > > > 160MB more memory to JVM metaspace by default won't
> cause a
> > >> big
> > >> >>>> > > problem,
> > >> >>>> > > > > based on the assumption that nowadays assigning 2GB/4GB
> > >> memory
> > >> >>>> per TM
> > >> >>>> > > is
> > >> >>>> > > > > the common case.
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 09:54, Xintong Song <
> > >> >>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > I think in FLINK-16406 we have not only increased the
> > >> default
> > >> >>>> value
> > >> >>>> > > for
> > >> >>>> > > > > > metaspace, but also increased the 'process.size' in
> > default
> > >> >>>> > > > > > 'flink-conf.yaml'.
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > That means:
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >    - For people using the default 'flink-conf.yaml',
> it's
> > >> not
> > >> >>>> > really
> > >> >>>> > > > > taking
> > >> >>>> > > > > >    memory from heap / managed for metaspace.
> > >> >>>> > > > > >    - For people using custom configuration files:
> > >> >>>> > > > > >       - If they are specifying 'flink.size', then
> > metaspace
> > >> >>>> does
> > >> >>>> > not
> > >> >>>> > > > > really
> > >> >>>> > > > > >       affect the flink memory internal components
> (heap,
> > >> >>>> managed,
> > >> >>>> > > > etc.).
> > >> >>>> > > > > >       - If they are specifying 'process.size' (most
> > likely
> > >> >>>> active
> > >> >>>> > > > > setups),
> > >> >>>> > > > > >       then they will have less heap / managed memory,
> or
> > >> >>>> worse,
> > >> >>>> > their
> > >> >>>> > > > > >       configuration may not work without adjustment.
> > >> >>>> > > > > >          - For a TM with large process memory (e.g., 4
> GB
> > >> or
> > >> >>>> more),
> > >> >>>> > > it
> > >> >>>> > > > is
> > >> >>>> > > > > >          probably ok that the metaspace takes 160 MB
> more
> > >> >>>> memory.
> > >> >>>> > > > > >          - For a TM with smaller total memory (1 or 2
> GB)
> > >> the
> > >> >>>> > > metaspace
> > >> >>>> > > > > >          increase is more likely to cause problem.
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > So basically only people have small 'process.size' in
> > >> custom
> > >> >>>> config
> > >> >>>> > > > file
> > >> >>>> > > > > > are really affected. I'm not sure what is the
> proportion
> > of
> > >> >>>> such
> > >> >>>> > use
> > >> >>>> > > > > cases
> > >> >>>> > > > > > though. (From questions asked on the user ML, probably
> > not
> > >> >>>> much).
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > Thank you~
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > Xintong Song
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:09 PM Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>>> se...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > No need to revert it now - I am not saying it should
> > not
> > >> go
> > >> >>>> into
> > >> >>>> > > > > 1.10.1,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > I
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > am just saying this is not clear to me yet.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > We have to trade off the fact that we may break some
> > >> >>>> deployments
> > >> >>>> > > with
> > >> >>>> > > > > the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > fact that we will "safe" a lot of new deployments.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > I simply lack the data points / insight at the moment
> > to
> > >> >>>> > understand
> > >> >>>> > > > how
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > significant both cases are, meaning how many users
> > would
> > >> be
> > >> >>>> > > affected
> > >> >>>> > > > > and
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > how badly.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > Independent of that, improving the error message is
> > >> always
> > >> >>>> > helpful.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:22 PM Andrey Zagrebin <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > azagrebin.apa...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >   - For 1.10.1 I am not completely sure, because
> > >> users
> > >> >>>> expect
> > >> >>>> > > to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > upgrade
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > that without config adjustments. That might not
> be
> > >> >>>> possible
> > >> >>>> > > with
> > >> >>>> > > > > that
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > change.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > Ok, makes sense, I will revert it for 1.10 and only
> > >> try to
> > >> >>>> > > improve
> > >> >>>> > > > > > error
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > message and docs.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > On 12 Mar 2020, at 13:15, Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>>> se...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > @Andrey about the increase in metaspace size
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >   - I have no concerns for 1.11.0.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >   - For 1.10.1 I am not completely sure, because
> > >> users
> > >> >>>> expect
> > >> >>>> > > to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > upgrade
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > that without config adjustments. That might not
> be
> > >> >>>> possible
> > >> >>>> > > with
> > >> >>>> > > > > that
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > change.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:55 PM Andrey Zagrebin
> <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > azagrebin.apa...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> About "FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace
> > OOM
> > >> >>>> error
> > >> >>>> > on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > repeated
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> job”
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> My understanding that the issue is basically
> > covered
> > >> >>>> by:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> - [FLINK-16225] Metaspace Out Of Memory should
> be
> > >> >>>> handled as
> > >> >>>> > > > Fatal
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > Error
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> in TaskManager
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>   no full consensus there but improving error
> > >> message
> > >> >>>> for
> > >> >>>> > > > existing
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > task
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> thread fatal handling could be done at least
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> - [FLINK-16406] Increase default value for JVM
> > >> >>>> Metaspace to
> > >> >>>> > > > > minimise
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > its
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> OutOfMemoryError
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>   see further
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> - [FLINK-16246] Exclude
> "SdkMBeanRegistrySupport"
> > >> from
> > >> >>>> > > > dynamically
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > loaded
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> AWS connectors
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>  not sure whether this is a blocker but looks
> > close
> > >> to
> > >> >>>> be
> > >> >>>> > > > resolved
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> About "FLINK-16406 Increase default value for
> JVM
> > >> >>>> > Metaspace"
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> - Have we consensus that this is okay for a
> > bugfix
> > >> >>>> release?
> > >> >>>> > > It
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > changes
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> setups, takes away memory from heap / managed
> > >> memory
> > >> >>>> on
> > >> >>>> > > > existing
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > setups
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> that keep their flink-conf.yaml.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> My understanding was that increasing to 256m
> > >> resolved
> > >> >>>> the
> > >> >>>> > > > reported
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > problems
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> and we decided to make the change so I have
> merged
> > >> it
> > >> >>>> today
> > >> >>>> > as
> > >> >>>> > > > > there
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > were
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> no more concerns.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> If there are concerns I can revert it.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> On the other hand, I think improving the message
> > >> error
> > >> >>>> with
> > >> >>>> > > > > > reference
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> the metaspace option should help the most
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> because user would not have to read all docs to
> > fix
> > >> it
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> then maybe this change is not even needed.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> Andrey
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> On 12 Mar 2020, at 12:28, Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>>> se...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> Good idea to go ahead with 1.10.1
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> About "FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace
> > OOM
> > >> >>>> error
> > >> >>>> > on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > repeated
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> job"
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> - I don't think we have consensus on the exact
> > >> >>>> solution,
> > >> >>>> > yet,
> > >> >>>> > > > and
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > some
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> of
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> the changes might also have side effects that
> are
> > >> >>>> hard to
> > >> >>>> > > > > predict,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > so I
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> am
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> not sure we should rush this in.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> About "FLINK-16406 Increase default value for
> JVM
> > >> >>>> > Metaspace"
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> - Have we consensus that this is okay for a
> > bugfix
> > >> >>>> release?
> > >> >>>> > > It
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > changes
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> setups, takes away memory from heap / managed
> > >> memory
> > >> >>>> on
> > >> >>>> > > > existing
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > setups
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> that keep their flink-conf.yaml.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> We may need to unblock the release form these
> two
> > >> >>>> issues
> > >> >>>> > and
> > >> >>>> > > > > think
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > about
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> having 1.10.2 in the near future.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:15 AM Yu Li <
> > >> >>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks for the reminder Jark. Will keep an eye
> > on
> > >> >>>> these
> > >> >>>> > two.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 12:32, Jark Wu <
> > >> >>>> imj...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> +1 to start 1.10.1 release cycle.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> From the Table SQL module, I think we should
> > also
> > >> >>>> try to
> > >> >>>> > > get
> > >> >>>> > > > in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> following issues:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> - FLINK-16441: Allow users to override
> > flink-conf
> > >> >>>> > > parameters
> > >> >>>> > > > > from
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > SQL
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> CLI
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> environment
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> this allows users to set e.g. statebackend,
> > >> >>>> watermark
> > >> >>>> > > > interval,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> exactly-once/at-least-once, in the SQL CLI
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> - FLINK-16217: SQL Client crashed when any
> > >> uncatched
> > >> >>>> > > > exception
> > >> >>>> > > > > is
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >> thrown
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> this will improve much experience when using
> > SQL
> > >> CLI
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Jark
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 20:37, Yu Li <
> > >> >>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for the suggestion Andrey! I've added
> > >> >>>> 1.10.1 into
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > FLINK-16225
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> fix
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> versions and promoted its priority to
> > Critical.
> > >> >>>> Will
> > >> >>>> > also
> > >> >>>> > > > > watch
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> progress of FLINK-16108/FLINK-16408.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 18:18, Andrey
> Zagrebin
> > <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > azagre...@apache.org
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Yu,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks for kicking off the 1.10.1 release
> > >> >>>> discussion!
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Apart from
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - FLINK-16406 Increase default value for
> JVM
> > >> >>>> Metaspace
> > >> >>>> > to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > minimise
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> its
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> which should be merged soon
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I think we should also try to get in the
> > >> following
> > >> >>>> > > issues:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-16225] Metaspace Out Of Memory
> > should
> > >> be
> > >> >>>> > handled
> > >> >>>> > > > as
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > Fatal
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Error
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> TaskManager
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> This should solve the Metaspace problem
> even
> > >> in a
> > >> >>>> > better
> > >> >>>> > > > way
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > because
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> OOM
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> failure should point users to the docs
> > >> immediately
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-16408] Bind user code class loader
> > to
> > >> >>>> lifetime
> > >> >>>> > > of
> > >> >>>> > > > a
> > >> >>>> > > > > > slot
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> This should give a better protection
> against
> > >> class
> > >> >>>> > > loading
> > >> >>>> > > > > > leaks
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-16018] Improve error reporting
> when
> > >> >>>> submitting
> > >> >>>> > > > batch
> > >> >>>> > > > > > job
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> (instead
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of AskTimeoutException)
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> This problem has recently happened for
> > multiple
> > >> >>>> users
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Andrey
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jingsong
> Li <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > jingsongl...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for driving. Yu. +1 for starting
> the
> > >> >>>> 1.10.1
> > >> >>>> > > > release.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Some issues are very important, Users are
> > >> looking
> > >> >>>> > > forward
> > >> >>>> > > > to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > them.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jingsong Lee
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 2:52 PM Yangze
> Guo <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > karma...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for starting the 1.10.1 release cycle.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Yangze Guo
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:42 PM Xintong
> > Song
> > >> <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Yu,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the explanation.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I've no concerns. I was just trying to
> get
> > >> some
> > >> >>>> > inputs
> > >> >>>> > > > for
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> prioritizing
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> tasks on my side, and ~1month sounds
> good
> > to
> > >> >>>> me.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thank you~
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:15 PM Yu Li <
> > >> >>>> > > > car...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> bq. what is the time plan for 1.10.1?
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> According to the history, the first
> patch
> > >> >>>> release
> > >> >>>> > of
> > >> >>>> > > a
> > >> >>>> > > > > > major
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> version
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> will
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> take ~1month from discussion started,
> > >> >>>> depending on
> > >> >>>> > > the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > speed
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> of
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> blocker
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issue resolving:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * 1.8.1: started discussion on May 28th
> > >> [1],
> > >> >>>> > released
> > >> >>>> > > > on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > Jul
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> 3rd
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> [2]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * 1.9.1: started discussion on Sep 23rd
> > >> [3],
> > >> >>>> > released
> > >> >>>> > > > on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > Oct
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> 19th
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> [4]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> We won't rush to match the history of
> > >> course,
> > >> >>>> but
> > >> >>>> > > could
> > >> >>>> > > > > use
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> it
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> as a
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> reference. And please feel free to let
> me
> > >> >>>> know if
> > >> >>>> > any
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> concerns
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Xintong.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-8-1-td29154.html
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-8-1-released-td30124.html
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-9-1-td33343.html
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-9-1-released-td34170.html
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 11:54, Xintong
> > Song
> > >> <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Yu, for the kick off and
> > >> volunteering
> > >> >>>> to be
> > >> >>>> > > the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> release
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> manager.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the proposal.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> One quick question, what is the time
> > plan
> > >> for
> > >> >>>> > > 1.10.1?
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you~
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:51 AM
> > Zhijiang
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com.invalid>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 on my side
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From:Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020 Mar. 10 (Tue.) 20:25
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink
> > >> 1.10.1
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the supplement Hequn. Yes
> > will
> > >> >>>> also
> > >> >>>> > keep
> > >> >>>> > > > an
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> eye
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> these
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> existing blocker issues.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 19:10, Hequn
> > >> Cheng <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> he...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yu,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for raising the
> > discussion
> > >> and
> > >> >>>> > > > volunteer
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> as
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager!
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found there are some other
> issues[1]
> > >> >>>> which are
> > >> >>>> > > > > marked
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> as
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> a
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> blocker:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16454 Update the copyright
> > year
> > >> in
> > >> >>>> > NOTICE
> > >> >>>> > > > > files
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16262 Class loader problem
> > with
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE
> > >> >>>> and
> > >> >>>> > > usrlib
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> directory
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> ClassNotFoundException
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> when
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> use
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16018 Improve error
> reporting
> > >> when
> > >> >>>> > > > submitting
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> batch
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> job
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (instead
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AskTimeoutException)
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These may also need to be resolved
> in
> > >> >>>> 1.10.1.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hequn
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12346891
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:48 PM Yu
> Li
> > <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jincheng,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, your help would be very
> helpful.
> > >> >>>> Thanks a
> > >> >>>> > > lot!
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 18:24,
> > jincheng
> > >> >>>> sun <
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> sunjincheng...@gmail.com
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for bring up the discussion
> > >> Yu. I
> > >> >>>> would
> > >> >>>> > > > like
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> give
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> you a
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hand
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the last stage when the RC is
> > >> >>>> finished.(If you
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> need)
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> :)
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jincheng
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >> 于2020年3月10日周二
> > >> >>>> > > 下午5:49写道:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been almost one month
> since
> > we
> > >> >>>> > released
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Flink
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1.10.0. We
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have more than 40 resolved
> > >> >>>> improvements/bugs
> > >> >>>> > in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release-1.10
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I propose to start the 1.10.1
> > >> >>>> release
> > >> >>>> > > cycle.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most noticeable fixes are:
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16241 [legal] Remove the
> > >> >>>> license and
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> notice
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> file
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-ml-lib
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16313 Fix RocksDB
> resource
> > >> leak
> > >> >>>> in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-state-processor-api
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16161 Statistics zero
> > should
> > >> be
> > >> >>>> known
> > >> >>>> > > in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> HiveCatalog
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2336
> > >> >>>> ArrayIndexOufOBoundsException in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> TypeExtractor
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapping
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16108 StreamSQLExample is
> > >> >>>> failed if
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> running
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> blink
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> planner
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16139 Co-location
> > constraints
> > >> >>>> are not
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> reset
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> task
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DefaultScheduler
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16414 Create udaf/udtf
> > >> function
> > >> >>>> using
> > >> >>>> > > sql
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> casuing
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ValidationException: SQL
> validation
> > >> >>>> failed
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I think the
> following
> > >> >>>> issues
> > >> >>>> > > should
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> be
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> merged
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> before
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (especially the Metaspace
> > OOM
> > >> >>>> issue):
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes
> > >> >>>> Metaspace
> > >> >>>> > OOM
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> error
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> on
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> repeated
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> job
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submission
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16406 Increase default
> > value
> > >> >>>> for JVM
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Metaspace
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> minimise
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16047 Blink planner
> > produces
> > >> >>>> wrong
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> aggregate
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> results
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean up
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16070 Blink planner can
> not
> > >> >>>> extract
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> correct
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> unique
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> key
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would volunteer as the release
> > >> >>>> manager and
> > >> >>>> > > kick
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> off
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once blocker issues are merged.
> > What
> > >> do
> > >> >>>> you
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> think?
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are any concerns or
> > missing
> > >> >>>> blocker
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> issues
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> need
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to be
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1, please let me know.
> Thanks.
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > > >
> > >> >>>> > > >
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to