Hi,

AFAIK there is no special watermark generation logic for temporal table
join operator. Could you share your example's codes then I can help to
analyze and debug?

Best,
Kurt


On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 9:53 PM Dominik Wosiński <wos...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> I have observed a weird behavior on using the Temporal Table Join and the
> way it pushes the Watermark forward. Generally, I think the question is
> *When
> is the Watermark pushed forward by the Temporal Table Join?*
>
> The issue I have noticed is that Watermark seems to be pushed forward even
> if elements are not generated, is that the expected behavior?
>
> I have created a simple test that takes two streams rates & ccyCodes. Now,
> I do temporal table Join of rates & ccyCodes in two ways :
> 1) SELECT ccyIsoCode, ccyIsoName, rate, rates_ts as ratesLong
>
> |  FROM RatesTable, LATERAL TABLE(ccyTable(rates_rowtime))
> |  WHERE ccyIsoCode = ratesCcyIsoCode
>
>
>
> 2) SELECT ccyIsoCode, ccyIsoName, rate, rates_rowtime as ratesTs
>
> |  FROM RatesTable, LATERAL TABLE(ccyTable(rates_rowtime))
> |  WHERE ccyIsoCode = ratesCcyIsoCode
>
> So, as You can see the only difference is the fact the in the first one I
> am selecting the field that is the timestamp but wasn't marked with
> *rowtime* in the second one I am selecting the actual *rowtime.*
>
> Now, I for the first method I need to reassign timestamps and watermarks,
> which I do.  Finally, I create time windows of size let's say 7000
> miliseconds and print the results. Now the unexpected behaviour I am facing
> is the fact that, say I create four artificial records for rates that are
> joined correctly with ccy with timestamps (1000, 5000, 8000, 20000)
>
>    - For the first method there is only one window generated with elements
>    [1000, 5000]
>    - But for the second method with *rowtime* there are two different
>    windows [1000, 5000] and [8000], this basically means that the watermark
>    for 20000 was generated.
>
> Is that the expected behavior ?? I was quite surprised that selecting
> different field can actually yied different results in terms of
> Watermarking.
>
> Best Regards,
> Dom.
>

Reply via email to