Hi Yu, Thanks for kicking off the 1.10.1 release discussion!
Apart from - FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace to minimise its OutOfMemoryError which should be merged soon I think we should also try to get in the following issues: - [FLINK-16225] Metaspace Out Of Memory should be handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager This should solve the Metaspace problem even in a better way because OOM failure should point users to the docs immediately - [FLINK-16408] Bind user code class loader to lifetime of a slot This should give a better protection against class loading leaks - [FLINK-16018] Improve error reporting when submitting batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException) This problem has recently happened for multiple users Best, Andrey On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for driving. Yu. +1 for starting the 1.10.1 release. > > Some issues are very important, Users are looking forward to them. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 2:52 PM Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for driving this release, Yu! > > > > +1 for starting the 1.10.1 release cycle. > > > > Best, > > Yangze Guo > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:42 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Yu, > > > Thanks for the explanation. > > > I've no concerns. I was just trying to get some inputs for prioritizing > > > tasks on my side, and ~1month sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:15 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > bq. what is the time plan for 1.10.1? > > > > > > > > According to the history, the first patch release of a major version > > will > > > > take ~1month from discussion started, depending on the speed of > blocker > > > > issue resolving: > > > > * 1.8.1: started discussion on May 28th [1], released on Jul 3rd [2] > > > > * 1.9.1: started discussion on Sep 23rd [3], released on Oct 19th [4] > > > > > > > > We won't rush to match the history of course, but could use it as a > > > > reference. And please feel free to let me know if any concerns > Xintong. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-8-1-td29154.html > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-8-1-released-td30124.html > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-9-1-td33343.html > > > > [4] > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-9-1-released-td34170.html > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 11:54, Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Yu, for the kick off and volunteering to be the release > > manager. > > > > > > > > > > +1 for the proposal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One quick question, what is the time plan for 1.10.1? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:51 AM Zhijiang > > > > > <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this release, Yu! > > > > > > +1 on my side > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Zhijiang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > From:Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Send Time:2020 Mar. 10 (Tue.) 20:25 > > > > > > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > > > > > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.10.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the supplement Hequn. Yes will also keep an eye on > these > > > > > > existing blocker issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 19:10, Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for raising the discussion and volunteer as the > > release > > > > > > > manager! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found there are some other issues[1] which are marked as a > > blocker: > > > > > > > - FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files > > > > > > > - FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with > > > > > > > FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory > > > > > > > - FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest ClassNotFoundException when > > use > > > > > > > flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7 > > > > > > > - FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when submitting batch job > > > > > (instead > > > > > > of > > > > > > > AskTimeoutException) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These may also need to be resolved in 1.10.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Hequn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12346891 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:48 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jincheng, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, your help would be very helpful. Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 18:24, jincheng sun < > > > > sunjincheng...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for bring up the discussion Yu. I would like to give > > you a > > > > > > hand > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > the last stage when the RC is finished.(If you need) :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > Jincheng > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月10日周二 下午5:49写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It has been almost one month since we released Flink > > 1.10.0. We > > > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > > have more than 40 resolved improvements/bugs in the > > > > release-1.10 > > > > > > > > branch, > > > > > > > > > > and I propose to start the 1.10.1 release cycle. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most noticeable fixes are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16241 [legal] Remove the license and notice file > in > > > > > > > > flink-ml-lib > > > > > > > > > > module > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16313 Fix RocksDB resource leak in > > > > > > flink-state-processor-api > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16161 Statistics zero should be known in > > HiveCatalog > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-2336 ArrayIndexOufOBoundsException in > TypeExtractor > > > > when > > > > > > > > mapping > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16108 StreamSQLExample is failed if running in > > blink > > > > > > planner > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16139 Co-location constraints are not reset on > task > > > > > > recovery > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > DefaultScheduler > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16414 Create udaf/udtf function using sql casuing > > > > > > > > > > ValidationException: SQL validation failed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Furthermore, I think the following issues should be > merged > > > > before > > > > > > > > 1.10.1 > > > > > > > > > > release (especially the Metaspace OOM issue): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on > > > > repeated > > > > > > job > > > > > > > > > > submission > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace to > > > > > minimise > > > > > > > its > > > > > > > > > > OutOfMemoryError > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate > > results > > > > with > > > > > > > state > > > > > > > > > > clean up > > > > > > > > > > - FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract correct > unique > > key > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > UpsertStreamTableSink > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would volunteer as the release manager and kick off the > > > > release > > > > > > > > process > > > > > > > > > > once blocker issues are merged. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If there are any concerns or missing blocker issues need > > to be > > > > > > fixed > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > 1.10.1, please let me know. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best, Jingsong Lee >
