You may very well may be ;)

This gives us one more reason to remove this stuff.

On 03/03/2020 14:52, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
Yes, in my experience.. I always asked myself if I was the only one using Eclipse.. :D

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:33 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote:

    To clarify, the whole lifecycle-mapping business is both
    unnecessary and
    actively harmful?

    On 03/03/2020 14:18, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
    > Sorry for the late reply. I'm using the latest Eclipse (2019-12
    R) and if I
    > create a project using the Flink 1.10 archetype Eclipse doesn't
    reconstruct
    > correctly the sources folders.
    > If I remove the lifecycle-mapping plugin from the build section
    everything
    > works as expected.
    >
    > About Flink development it's almost the same. I only need to
    install the
    > scale plugin if I need to debug or edit the scala code.
    >
    > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:45 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org
    <mailto:se...@apache.org>> wrote:
    >
    >> Flavio, do you load Flink source code into Eclipse, or develop
    Flink
    >> applications in Eclipse (based on the quickstart archetypes)?
    >>
    >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:10 PM Chesnay Schepler
    <ches...@apache.org <mailto:ches...@apache.org>>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> What do you have to change it to?
    >>>
    >>> What happens if you just remove it completely?
    >>>
    >>> On 28/02/2020 16:08, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
    >>>> I use Eclipse but the stuff added in the pom.xml to improve the
    >>>> out-of-the-box experience is pretty useless, I always have to
    change it
    >>>>
    >>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:01 PM Chesnay Schepler
    <ches...@apache.org <mailto:ches...@apache.org>>
    >>> wrote:
    >>>>> Hello,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> in various maven pom.xml we have some plugin definitions
    exclusively to
    >>>>> increase support for the Eclipse IDE.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>    From what I have heard developing Flink is not really
    possible with
    >>>>> Exclipse (we explicitly recommend IntelliJ in our
    documentation); I'm
    >>>>> not aware of any committer using it at least.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Hence I wanted to ask here to find out whether anyone is
    using Eclipse.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If not, then I would like remove this stuff from the poms in
    an effort
    >>>>> to reduce noise, and to reduce issues when using other IDE's
    (like what
    >>>>> happened for vscode-java in FLINK-16150).
    >>>>>
    >>>


Reply via email to